Editing Rosa Parks (section)

===Historiography===
Many popular narratives surrounding Parks portray her as a heroine, with Senate Majority Leader [[Bill Frist]] claiming that Parks's refusal to move was "not an intentional attempt to change a nation, but a singular act aimed at restoring the dignity of the individual".{{sfn|Theoharis|2015|pp=vii-ix}} Writing in the ''[[Florida State University Law Review]]'', civil rights advocate [[A. Leon Higginbotham Jr.]] describes Parks as a "heroine" who exemplified both "raw courage" and "genteelness".{{sfn|Higginbotham Jr.|1995|p=901}} Academic Kenan İli characterizes Parks as an "icon of leadership", emphasizing her "quiet strength" and "feminine dignity". He argues that Parks's actions, driven by "values and integrity", served as a powerful catalyst for change, inspiring both a city and a nation to confront their systemic injustices.{{sfn|İli|2016|pp=91-92}}

Theoharis, in her 2015 biography ''The Rebellious Life of Mrs. Rosa Parks'', argues that the popular narrative of Rosa Parks as a "quiet" and "accidental" figure in the civil rights movement obscures her lifelong radical activism and political philosophy, as well as the "variety of struggles" that she took part in. She describes the "quiet" portrayal of Parks as a "gendered caricature", contending that interviewers misinterpreted her words in an attempt to form their own narratives around Parks.{{sfn|Theoharis|2015|pp=viii-xi}} Academic Riché Richardson similarly critiques the "uses, abuses, and appropriations" of Parks's legacy in contemporary political discourse, particularly the ways in which her image has been manipulated to serve various political agendas.{{sfn|Richardson|2021|p=123}}

Academic Dennis Carlson argues that the popular conception of Rosa Parks transforms her into a "monumentalist hero", a figure used to reinforce conservative narratives of American history and morality. According to Carlson, this portrayal isolates her act of defiance, framing it as an individual, legally-focused moment of courage that both ignited and calmed a potentially violent Black community.{{sfn|Carlson|2003|pp=47-49}} Biographer Darryl Mace speculates that Parks's passive and quiet public image was shaped both by the gendered norms of the 1950s and the male-dominated leadership of the civil rights movement. He contends that Parks was relegated to gendered roles in the movement, and that her refusal to move was framed within a narrative of female vulnerability.{{sfn|Mace|2021|pp=160-162}}

Scholars have also examined Parks's actions in relation to other, earlier instances of civil disobedience. Sociologist [[Barry Schwartz (sociologist)|Barry Schwartz]] posits that while Parks became the celebrated symbol of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, many other individuals—including Browder, Colvin, Smith, and McDonald—played equally important and even more active roles in the struggle against segregation.{{sfn|Schwartz|2009|pp=128-130}} Colvin herself felt a mix of emotions regarding Parks, glad that an adult had "stood up to the system" but also a feeling a sense of abandonment because the community had not supported her similar actions months prior.{{refn|group=lower-alpha|While Colvin initially received support from the local NAACP, some community leaders saw her as "feisty", "uncontrollable", and not of the "right social standing". They did not pursue her case, and her later pregnancy further distanced her from the organization.{{sfn|Theoharis|2015|pp=57–58}}}}{{sfn|Theoharis|2015|p=78}} Browder's son maintained that Parks's prominence had overshadowed his mother's contributions, leaving her role largely unrecognized.{{sfn|Schwartz|2009|p=138}} Schwartz argues that accounts emphasizing the exceptional nature of Parks's refusal to move necessarily simplify the civil rights movement, creating a more accessible and symbolically compelling narrative.{{sfn|Schwartz|2009|p=135}}