Editing Precautionary principle (section)

===Vagueness and plausibility===
The precautionary principle calls for action in the face of scientific uncertainty, but some formulations do not specify the minimal threshold of plausibility of risk that acts as a "triggering" condition, so that any indication that a proposed product or activity might harm health or the environment is sufficient to invoke the principle.<ref name="vandenBelt">{{cite journal |doi=10.1104/pp.103.023531 |author=van den Belt H |title=Debating the Precautionary Principle: "Guilty until Proven Innocent" or "Innocent until Proven Guilty"? |journal=Plant Physiol. |volume=132 |issue=3 |pages=1122–6 |date=July 2003 |pmid=12857792 |pmc=526264 }}</ref><ref>Bailey, Ronald. [http://www.reason.com/news/show/30977.html Precautionary Tale] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080313211959/https://www.reason.com/news/show/30977.html |date=13 March 2008 }}. Reason. April 1999</ref> In ''Sancho vs. [[United States Department of Energy|DOE]]'', Helen Gillmor, Senior District Judge, wrote in a dismissal of Wagner's lawsuit which included a popular<ref>{{cite web |author=Highfield |first=Roger |date=5 September 2008 |title=Scientists get death threats over Large Hadron Collider |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/3351119/Scientists-get-death-threats-over-Large-Hadron-Collider.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090801125522/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/3351119/Scientists-get-death-threats-over-Large-Hadron-Collider.html |archive-date=1 August 2009 |access-date=29 October 2014 |work=Telegraph.co.uk}}</ref> worry that the [[Large Hadron Collider|LHC]] could cause "destruction of the earth" by a [[black hole]]:

{{Blockquote|Injury in fact requires some "credible threat of harm." ''Cent. Delta Water Agency v. United States'', 306 F.3d 938, 950 (9th Cir. 2002). At most, Wagner has alleged that experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (the "Collider") have "potential adverse consequences." Speculative fear of future harm does not constitute an injury in fact sufficient to confer [[Standing (law)#United States|standing]]. ''Mayfield'', 599 F.3d at 970.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://networkedblogs.com/7erBW|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100830183119/http://networkedblogs.com/7erBW|url-status=usurped|archive-date=30 August 2010|title=LHC lawsuit dismissed by US court|work=symmetry magazine|access-date=29 October 2014}}</ref>}}