Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Phase-shift keying
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Demodulation=== [[File:DPSK BER curves.svg|thumb|right|280px|BER comparison between DBPSK, DQPSK and their non-differential forms using Gray coding and operating in white noise]] For a signal that has been differentially encoded, there is an obvious alternative method of demodulation. Instead of demodulating as usual and ignoring carrier-phase ambiguity, the phase between two successive received symbols is compared and used to determine what the data must have been. When differential encoding is used in this manner, the scheme is known as differential phase-shift keying (DPSK). Note that this is subtly different from just differentially encoded PSK since, upon reception, the received symbols are ''not'' decoded one-by-one to constellation points but are instead compared directly to one another. Call the received symbol in the <math>k</math><sup>th</sup> timeslot <math>r_k</math> and let it have phase <math>\phi_k</math>. Assume without loss of generality that the phase of the carrier wave is zero. Denote the [[additive white Gaussian noise]] (AWGN) term as <math>n_k</math>. Then :<math>r_k = \sqrt{E_s}e^{j\phi_k} + n_k.</math> The decision variable for the <math>k-1</math><sup>th</sup> symbol and the <math>k</math><sup>th</sup> symbol is the phase difference between <math>r_k</math> and <math>r_{k-1}</math>. That is, if <math>r_k</math> is projected onto <math>r_{k-1}</math>, the decision is taken on the phase of the resultant complex number: :<math>r_kr_{k-1}^* = E_se^{j\left(\varphi_k - \varphi_{k-1}\right)} + \sqrt{E_s}e^{j\varphi_k}n_{k-1}^* + \sqrt{E_s}e^{-j\varphi_{k-1}}n_k + n_kn_{k-1}^*</math> where superscript * denotes [[complex conjugation]]. In the absence of noise, the phase of this is <math>\phi_{k}-\phi_{k-1}</math>, the phase-shift between the two received signals which can be used to determine the data transmitted. The probability of error for DPSK is difficult to calculate in general, but, in the case of DBPSK it is: :<math>P_b = \frac{1}{2}e^{-\frac{E_b}{N_0}},</math><ref>{{cite journal |first=G.L. |last=Stüber |title=Soft Decision Direct-Sequence DPSK Receivers |journal=IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology |volume=37 |issue=3 |pages=151–157 |date=August 1988 |doi=10.1109/25.16541 }}</ref> which, when numerically evaluated, is only slightly worse than ordinary BPSK, particularly at higher <math>E_b/N_0</math> values. Using DPSK avoids the need for possibly complex carrier-recovery schemes to provide an accurate phase estimate and can be an attractive alternative to ordinary PSK. In [[optical communications]], the data can be modulated onto the phase of a [[laser]] in a differential way. The modulation is a laser which emits a [[continuous wave]], and a [[Mach–Zehnder modulator]] which receives electrical binary data. For the case of BPSK, the laser transmits the field unchanged for binary '1', and with reverse polarity for '0'. The demodulator consists of a [[delay line interferometer]] which delays one bit, so two bits can be compared at one time. In further processing, a [[photodiode]] is used to transform the [[optical field]] into an electric current, so the information is changed back into its original state. The bit-error rates of DBPSK and DQPSK are compared to their non-differential counterparts in the graph to the right. The loss for using DBPSK is small enough compared to the complexity reduction that it is often used in communications systems that would otherwise use BPSK. For DQPSK though, the loss in performance compared to ordinary QPSK is larger and the system designer must balance this against the reduction in complexity.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Phase-shift keying
(section)
Add topic