Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Mind–body dualism
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Recent=== In addition to already discussed theories of dualism (particularly the Christian and Cartesian models) there are new theories in the defense of dualism. [[Naturalistic dualism]] comes from Australian philosopher, [[David Chalmers]] (born 1966) who argues there is an explanatory gap between objective and subjective experience that cannot be bridged by reductionism because consciousness is, at least, logically autonomous of the physical properties upon which it supervenes. According to Chalmers, a naturalistic account of property dualism requires a new fundamental category of properties described by new laws of [[supervenience]]; the challenge being analogous to that of understanding electricity based on the mechanistic and Newtonian models of materialism prior to [[Maxwell's equations]]. A similar defense comes from Australian philosopher [[Frank Cameron Jackson|Frank Jackson]] (born 1943) who revived the theory of [[epiphenomenalism]] which argues that mental states do not play a role in physical states. Jackson argues that there are two kinds of dualism: # ''substance dualism'' that assumes there is second, non-corporeal form of reality. In this form, body and soul are two different substances. # ''property dualism'' that says that body and soul are different ''properties'' of the same body. He claims that functions of the mind/soul are internal, very private experiences that are not accessible to observation by others, and therefore not accessible by science (at least not yet). We can know everything, for example, about a bat's facility for echolocation, but we will never know how the bat experiences that phenomenon. In 2018, ''The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism'' was published that contains arguments for and against Cartesian dualism, emergent dualism, Thomistic dualism, emergent individualism and nonreductive physicalism.<ref name="Oldhoff 2019">{{cite journal|author=Oldhoff, Martine C. L.|year=2019|title=Review of The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism|journal=Journal of Analytic Theology|url=https://jat-ojs-baylor.tdl.org/jat/index.php/jat/article/view/316/541|volume=7|issue=1|pages=753–758|doi=10.12978/jat.2019-7.1200-51141105|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|author=Prestes III, Flavio|year=2019|title=Review: The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism|journal=Andrews University Seminary Studies |url=https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/auss/vol57/iss2/21/|volume=57|issue=2|pages=414–418}}</ref> Contributors include [[Charles Taliaferro]], Edward Feser, William Hasker, J. P. Moreland, Richard Swinburne, [[Lynne Rudder Baker]], John W. Cooper and Timothy O'Connor.<ref name="Oldhoff 2019"/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Mind–body dualism
(section)
Add topic