Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Consensus decision-making
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Criticism of majority voting processes=== Some proponents of consensus decision-making view procedures that use [[majority rule]] as undesirable for several reasons. Majority [[voting]] is regarded as [[Competition|competitive]], rather than [[cooperation|cooperative]], framing decision-making in a win/lose dichotomy that ignores the possibility of [[compromise]] or other mutually beneficial solutions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.oikoumene.org/en/news/news-management/all-news-english/display-single-english-news/browse/4/article/1634/consensus-a-colourful-fa-1.html |title=Consensus: a colourful farewell to majority rule |access-date=17 January 2007 |author=Friedrich Degenhardt |year=2006 |publisher=World Council of Churches |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061206132304/http://www.oikoumene.org/en/news/news-management/all-news-english/display-single-english-news/browse/4/article/1634/consensus-a-colourful-fa-1.html |archive-date=6 December 2006 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Carlos Santiago Nino, on the other hand, has argued that majority rule leads to better deliberation practice than the alternatives, because it requires each member of the group to make arguments that appeal to at least half the participants.<ref>{{Cite book|last=McGann|first=Anthony|url=http://www.press.umich.edu/189565|title=The Logic of Democracy: Reconciling Equality, Deliberation, and Minority Protection|date=2006|publisher=University of Michigan Press|isbn=978-0-472-09949-8|location=Ann Arbor, MI|language=en|doi=10.3998/mpub.189565}}</ref> Some advocates of consensus would assert that a majority decision reduces the commitment of each individual decision-maker to the decision. Members of a minority position may feel less commitment to a majority decision, and even majority voters who may have taken their positions along party or bloc lines may have a sense of reduced responsibility for the ultimate decision. The result of this reduced commitment, according to many consensus proponents, is potentially less willingness to defend or act upon the decision. Majority voting cannot measure consensus. Indeed,—so many 'for' and so many 'against'—it measures the very opposite, the degree of dissent. The [[Modified Borda Count]] has been put forward as a voting method which better approximates consensus.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Rhizome |date=2011-06-02 |title=Near-consensus alternatives: Crowd Wise |url=https://rhizomenetwork.wordpress.com/2011/06/02/near-consensus-alternatives-crowd-wise/ |access-date=2022-05-30 |website=Welcome to the archived Rhizome website for useful resources |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":4" /><ref name=":3" />
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Consensus decision-making
(section)
Add topic