Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Precautionary principle
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Blocking innovation and progress generally=== {{See also|Fear, uncertainty and doubt}} Because applications of strong formulations of the precautionary principle can be used to block innovation, a technology which brings advantages may be banned by precautionary principle because of its potential for negative impacts, leaving the positive benefits unrealised.<ref name="Sunstein">Sunstein, Cass R. [http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv25n4/v25n4-9.pdf The Paralyzing Principle: Does the Precautionary Principle Point us in any Helpful Direction?] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070215223946/https://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv25n4/v25n4-9.pdf |date=15 February 2007 }} Regulation, Winter 2002β2003, The Cato Institute.</ref><ref>[[David Deutsch]], [https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Beginning_of_Infinity.html?id=WFZl7YvsiuIC The Beginning of Infinity] Penguin Books (UK), Viking Press (US), 2011. {{ISBN|978-0-7139-9274-8}}</ref>{{rp|201}}<ref>{{Cite journal|vauthors=Morris SH, Spillane C|year=2008|title=GM directive deficiencies in the European Union|journal=EMBO Reports|volume=9|issue=6|pages=500β504|doi=10.1038/embor.2008.94|pmid=18516083|pmc=2427373}}</ref> The precautionary principle has been ethically questioned on the basis that its application could block progress in developing countries.<ref>{{cite book|last=Jimenez-Arias|first=Luis G.|title=Biothics and the Environment|year=2008|publisher=Libros en Red|page=73|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YLjDG6sUaRkC&q=luis+g+jimenez+arias+biothics&pg=PA8|isbn=9781597543804}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Beware the Precautionary Principle|url=http://www.sirc.org/articles/beware.html|access-date=2021-03-16|website=www.sirc.org|archive-date=15 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210315065004/http://sirc.org/articles/beware.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> {{Blockquote|text=The precautionary principle presents a serious hazard to our health which extends way beyond the generation of unnecessary neuroses. The biggest correlate of our health and well being is our standard of living, as measured in conventional economic and physical terms. People in technologically advanced societies suffer fewer diseases and live longer than those in less developed nations. The biggest killer in the world is not genetically modified soya, pesticide residues or even tobacco. It is something which is given the code Z59.5 in the International Classification of Disease Handbook and accounts for more deaths world-wide than any other single factor. It is defined as 'Extreme Poverty'.|source=Social Issues Research Centre}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Precautionary principle
(section)
Add topic