Editing Patriot Act (section)

== Reauthorizations ==
The USA PATRIOT Act was reauthorized by three bills. The first, the ''USA PATRIOT and Terrorism Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2005'', was passed by Congress in July 2005. This bill reauthorized some, but not all, provisions of the original ''USA PATRIOT Act'', as well as the newer ''[[Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004]]''. It created new provisions relating to the [[capital punishment|death penalty]] for terrorists,<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title II ("Terrorist Death Penalty Enhancement")</ref> enhancing security at [[seaport]]s,<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title III ("Reducing Crime and Terrorism at America's Seaports")</ref> new measures to combat the financing of terrorism,<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title IV ("Combating Terrorism Financing")</ref> new powers for the [[United States Secret Service|Secret Service]],<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177) Title VI ("Secret Service")</ref> anti-[[methamphetamine]] initiatives<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title VII ("Combating Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005")</ref> and a number of other miscellaneous provisions. The second reauthorization act, the ''USA PATRIOT Act Additional Reauthorizing Amendments Act of 2006'', amended the first and was passed in February 2006.

The first act reauthorized all but two Title II provisions. Two sections were changed to sunset on December 31, 2009: section 206—the roving wiretap provision—and section 215, which allowed access to business records under FISA. Section 215 was amended further to give greater judicial oversight and review<!-- over?? -->. Such orders were also restricted to be authorized by only the FBI Director, the FBI Deputy Director, or the Executive Assistant Director for National Security, and minimization procedures were specified to limit the dissemination and collection of such information. Section 215 also had a "gag" provision, which was changed to allow the defendant to contact their attorney.<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 106</ref> However, the change meant that the defendant was also required to tell the FBI who they were disclosing the order to; this requirement was removed by the ''USA PATRIOT Act Additional Reauthorizing Amendments Act''.<ref>USA PATRIOT Act Additional Reauthorizing Amendments Act of 2006 (U.S. [[United States Senate|S.]] 2271, Public Law 109-178), Sec. 3.</ref>

On Saturday, February 27, 2010, President [[Barack Obama]] signed into law legislation that would temporarily extend, for one year, three controversial provisions of the Patriot Act that had been set to expire:<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0301/Obama-signs-Patriot-Act-extension-without-reforms/|title=Obama signs Patriot Act extension without reforms|website=Christian Science Monitor|date=March 1, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/13183 |title=Entertainment Archives |access-date=November 23, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101121121929/http://clevelandleader.com/node/13183 |archive-date=November 21, 2010 }}</ref><ref>Democratic Underground – Obama signs Patriot Act http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4287047</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=H.R.514 – 112th Congress (2011–2012): FISA Sunsets Extension Act of 2011 |url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/514 |website=Congress.gov |access-date=December 22, 2018|date=February 25, 2011 }}</ref>
* Authorize court-approved roving wiretaps that permit surveillance on multiple phones.
* Allow court-approved seizure of records and property in anti-terrorism operations.
* Permit surveillance against a so-called [[Lone wolf (terrorism)|lone wolf]] (a non-U.S. citizen engaged in terrorism who may not be part of a recognized terrorist group).<ref>Sections of the Patriot act that will remain as of Feb 2010 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/27/obama-signs-year-extension-patriot-act/ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151101064119/http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/27/obama-signs-year-extension-patriot-act/ |date=November 1, 2015 }}</ref>

In a vote on February 8, 2011, the House of Representatives considered a further extension of the Act through the end of 2011.<ref name=politico-vote>{{cite news |title=Rank-and-file take down Patriot Act in House |work=[[Politico]]|date=February 8, 2011 |first1=Jake |last1=Breshahan |first2=Marin |last2=Cogan |url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49126.html }}</ref> House leadership moved the extension bill under suspension of the rules, which is intended for noncontroversial legislation and requires two-thirds majority to pass.<ref name=politico-vote /> After the vote, the extension bill did not pass; 277 members voted in favor, which was less than the 290 votes needed to pass the bill under suspension of the rules.<ref name=politico-vote /> Without an extension, the Act was set to expire on February 28, 2011. However, it eventually passed, 275–144.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:HR00514:@@@L&summ2=m&#major |title=actions |publisher=Thomas.loc.gov |date=February 25, 2011 |access-date=May 16, 2012 |archive-date=August 25, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130825010625/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:HR00514:@@@L&summ2=m&#major |url-status=dead }}</ref> The [[FISA Sunsets Extension Act]] of 2011 was signed into law February 25, 2011.

On May 26, 2011, [[Barack Obama|President Barack Obama]] used an [[Autopen]] to sign the PATRIOT Sunsets Extension Act of 2011, a four-year extension of three key provisions in the USA PATRIOT Act while he was in France:<ref name="foxnews" /> [[roving wiretap]]s, searches of business records (the "[[library records provision]]"), and conducting surveillance of "lone wolves"—individuals suspected of terrorist-related activities not linked to terrorist groups.<ref name="Mascaro-2011" /> Republican leaders<ref>{{cite web|title=Letter to Obama|publisher=[[CBS News]]|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/AutopenLetter061711a.pdf|access-date=November 4, 2012|date=June 17, 2011}}</ref> questioned if the use of the Autopen met the constitutional requirements for signing a bill into law.<ref>{{cite news|title=Republicans protest Obama signing bill with autopen|newspaper=[[USA Today]]|url=http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/06/republican-protest-obama-bill-signing-with-autopen-/1#.UIqv4Gl25SY|date=June 17, 2011}}</ref>

As NSL provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act had been struck by the courts<ref name="ACLUvDoJ" /> the reauthorization Act amended the law in an attempt to make them lawful. It provided for judicial review and the legal right of a recipient to challenge the validity of the letter. The reauthorization act still allowed NSLs to be closed and all evidence to be presented ''[[in camera]]'' and ''[[ex parte]]''.<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 115</ref> Gag provisions were maintained but were not automatic. They only occurred when the deputy assistant director of the FBI or a special agent in charge in a bureau field office certified that disclosure would result in "a danger to the national security of the United States, interference with a criminal, counterterrorism, or counterintelligence investigation, interference with diplomatic relations, or danger to the life or physical safety of any person".<ref name="ReauthNSLsGag">USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 116</ref> However, should there be no non-disclosure order, the defendant can disclose the fact of the NSL to anyone who can render them assistance in carrying out the letter, or to an attorney for legal advice. Again, however, the recipient was ordered to inform the FBI of such a disclosure.<ref name="ReauthNSLsGag" /> Because of the concern over the chilling effects of such a requirement, the ''Additional Reauthorization Amendments Act'' removed the requirement to inform the FBI that the recipient spoke about the NSL to their Attorney.<ref>USA PATRIOT Act Additional Reauthorizing Amendments Act of 2006 (U.S. [[United States Senate|S.]] 2271, Public Law 109-178), Sec. 4.</ref> Later, the ''Additional Reauthorization Amendments Act'' excluded libraries from receiving NSLs, except where they provide electronic communications services.<ref>USA PATRIOT Act Additional Reauthorizing Amendments Act of 2006 (U.S. [[United States Senate|S.]] 2271, Public Law 109-178), Sec. 5.</ref> The reauthorization Act also ordered the Attorney General submit a report semi-annually to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, the House and Senate Intelligence Committees and the [[House Committee on Financial Services]] and the [[Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs]] on all NSL request made under the ''Fair Credit Reporting Act''.<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 118</ref>

Changes were made to the roving wiretap provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act. Applications and orders for such wiretaps must describe the specific target of the electronic surveillance if the identity of the target is not known. If the nature and location of each of the facilities or places targeted for surveillance is not known, then after 10 days the agency must provide notice to the court. The notice must include the nature and location of each new facility or place at which the electronic surveillance was directed. It must also describe the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant to justify the applicant's belief that each new surveillance place or facility under surveillance is or was being used by the target of the surveillance. The applicant must also provide a statement detailing any proposed minimization procedures that differ from those contained in the original application or order, that may be necessitated by a change in the facility or place at which the electronic surveillance is directed. Applicants must detail the total number of electronic surveillances that have been or are being conducted under the authority of the order.<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 108</ref>

Section 213 of the USA PATRIOT Act was modified. Previously it stated that delayed notifications would be made to recipients of "sneak and peek" searches in a "reasonable period". This was seen as unreasonable, as it was undefined and could potentially be used indefinitely. Thus, the reauthorization act changed this to a period not exceeding 30 days after the date of the execution of the search warrant. Courts were given the opportunity to extend this period if they were provided good cause to do so. Section 213 states that delayed notifications could be issued if there is "reasonable cause to believe that providing immediate notification of the execution of the warrant may have an adverse result". This was criticized, particularly by the ACLU, for allowing potential abuse by law enforcement agencies<ref>''[[American Civil Liberties Union]]'', [https://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/22394leg20051207.html ACLU Letter to Congress Urging A "No" Vote On the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act Conference Report] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091017170136/http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/22394leg20051207.html |date=October 17, 2009 }} (December 12, 2005), accessed on October 6, 2007.</ref> and was later amended to prevent a delayed notification "if the adverse results consist only of unduly delaying a trial".<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 114</ref> In September 2007 an Oregon US District Court struck down the Sneak and Peak provisions of the USA PATRIOT ACT,<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Singel |first=Ryan |url=https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/09/court-strikes-2/ |title=Court Strikes Down 2 Key Patriot Act Provisions &#124; Threat Level |magazine=Wired |date= September 26, 2007|access-date=May 16, 2012}}</ref> but in December 2009 the [[Ninth Circuit]] overturned this decision.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2009/12/10/07-35865.pdf|title=Full text of the Ninth Circuit's decision @ uscourts.gov|website=uscourts.gov}}</ref>

The reauthorization act also legislates increased congressional oversight for emergency disclosures by communication providers undertaken under section 212 of the USA PATRIOT Act.<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 107</ref> The duration of FISA surveillance and physical search orders were increased. Surveillance performed against "lone wolf terrorists" under section 207 of the USA PATRIOT Act were increased to 120 days for an initial order, while pen registers and trap and trace device extensions under FISA were increased from 90 days to a year. The reauthorization act also increased congressional oversight, requiring a semi-annual report into physical searches and the use of pen registers and trap and trace devices under FISA.<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 109</ref> The "lone wolf terrorist" provision (Section 207) was a sunset provision that also was to have expired; however, this was enhanced by the ''Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004''. The reauthorization act extended the expiration date to December 31, 2009.<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 105</ref> The amendment to material support law done in the ''Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act''<ref name="MaterialSupportRedux" /> was also made permanent.<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 104</ref> The definition of terrorism was further expanded to include receiving military-type training from a foreign terrorist organization and [[narcoterrorism]].<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 112</ref> Other provisions of the reauthorization act was to merge the law outlawing train wrecking ({{usc|18|992}}) and the law outlawing attacks on mass transportation systems ({{usc|18|1993}}) into a new section of Title 18 of the U.S. Code ({{usc|18|1992}}) and also to criminalize the act of planning a terrorist attack against a mass transport system.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Yeah|first1=Brian T.|last2=Doyle| first2=Charles|date=December 21, 2006|title=USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005: A Legal Analysis|publisher=[[Congressional Research Service]]|page=24|url=https://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/78416.pdf|access-date= July 11, 2008}}</ref><ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 110</ref> [[asset forfeiture|Forfeiture law]] was further changed and now assets within U.S. jurisdiction will be seized for illegally trafficking in nuclear, chemical, biological or radiological weapons technology or material, if such offense is punishable under foreign law by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. Alternatively, this applies if similar punishment would be so punishable if committed within the U.S.<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 111.</ref> A sense of Congress was further expressed that victims of terrorism should be entitled to the forfeited assets of terrorists.<ref>USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (U.S. [[United States House of Representatives|H.R.]] 3199, Public Law 109-177), Title I, Sec. 127.</ref>

The Trump administration delivered a letter to Congress in August 2019 urging them to make permanent three surveillance provisions of the Patriot Act. The provisions included section 215, which enables domestic call-record collection as well as the collection of other types of business records.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Savage|first=Charlie|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/15/us/politics/trump-nsa-call-records-program.html|title=Trump Administration Asks Congress to Reauthorize N.S.A.'s Deactivated Call Records Program|date=August 15, 2019|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=February 7, 2020|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref>

In November 2019, the House approved a three-month extension of the Patriot Act which would have expired on December 15, 2019.  It was included as part of a bigger stop-gap spending bill aimed at preventing government shutdown which was approved by a vote of 231–192. The vote was mostly along party lines with Democrats voting in favor and Republicans voting against. Republican opposition was largely due to the bill's failure to include $5 billion for border security.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/11/21/fund-n21.html|title=Patriot Act extension concealed in funding bill passed by House Democrats|last=Grey|first=Barry|website=www.wsws.org|date=November 21, 2019 |language=en|access-date=February 7, 2020}}</ref> Ten Democrats voted against the bill. This group included a number of progressive Democrats who urged their colleagues to oppose the bill over the measure to extend surveillance.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://thehill.com/policy/technology/471161-progressives-oppose-stopgap-funding-measure-over-surveillance-authority|title=Progressives oppose spending stopgap measure over surveillance authority extension|last=Birnbaum|first=Emily|date=November 19, 2019|website=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|language=en|access-date=February 7, 2020}}</ref>  Representative [[Justin Amash]] (Independent) submitted an amendment to remove the Patriot Act provisions, but it was defeated by the House Rules committee.<ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://newrepublic.com/article/155793/hell-democrats-just-extend-patriot-act|title=Why the Hell Did Democrats Just Extend the Patriot Act?|last=Adler-Bell|first=Sam|date=November 20, 2019|magazine=The New Republic|access-date=November 25, 2019|issn=0028-6583}}</ref>

On March 10, 2020, [[Jerry Nadler]] proposed a bill to reauthorize the Patriot Act, and it was then approved by the majority of US House of Representatives after 152 Democrats joined the GOP in supporting the extension.<ref name=stillrenewal>{{Cite web | url=https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/03/12/152-house-democrats-join-gop-reauthorize-abusive-government-surveillance-powers |title = 152 House Democrats Join GOP to Reauthorize 'Abusive Government Surveillance Powers'}}</ref> The surveillance powers of the Patriot Act needed renewal by March 15, 2020,<ref name=surveillancerenewal>{{Cite web | url=https://theintercept.com/2020/02/27/coronavirus-spending-bill-surveillance-patriot-act/ | title=Coronavirus Spending Bill Could be Used to Cement Spying Powers, Surveillance Critics in Congress Warned| date=February 27, 2020}}</ref> and after it expired, the U.S. Senate approved an amended version of the bill.<ref name=renewal>{{Cite web | url=https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/fisa-update/ |title = FISA Update|website = [[National Review]]|date = March 18, 2020}}</ref> After President Donald Trump threatened to veto the bill, the House of Representatives issued an indefinite postponement of the vote to pass the Senate version of the bill; {{as of|2020|12|lc=y}}, the Patriot Act remains expired.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.tomsguide.com/news/fisa-provisions-die-in-house|publisher=[[Tom's Guide]]|author=Nicholas Fearn|date=May 29, 2020|access-date=June 28, 2020|title=Patriot Act surveillance powers left unrenewed after Trump threatens veto}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/12/section-215-expired-year-review-2020|publisher=[[Electronic Frontier Foundation]]|date=December 29, 2020|title=Section 215 Expired}}</ref>