Editing Joke (section)

=== Linguistics ===
"The linguistics of humor has made gigantic strides forward in the last decade and a half and replaced the psychology of humor as the most advanced theoretical approach to the study of this important and universal human faculty."{{sfn|Raskin|1992|p=91}} This recent statement by one noted linguist and humour researcher describes, from his perspective, contemporary linguistic humour research. [[Linguistics|Linguists]] study words, how words are strung together to build sentences, how sentences create meaning which can be communicated from one individual to another, and how our interaction with each other using words creates [[Discourse Analysis|discourse]]. Jokes have been defined above as oral narratives in which words and sentences are engineered to build toward a punchline. The linguist's question is: what exactly makes the punchline funny? This question focuses on how the words used in the punchline create humour, in contrast to the psychologist's concern (see above) with the audience's response to the punchline. The assessment of humour by psychologists "is made from the individual's perspective; e.g. the phenomenon associated with responding to or creating humor and not a description of humor itself."{{sfn|Ruch|2008|p=19}} Linguistics, on the other hand, endeavours to provide a precise description of what makes a text funny.{{sfn|Ruch|2008|p=25}}

Two major new linguistic theories have been developed and tested within the last decades. The first was advanced by Victor Raskin in "Semantic Mechanisms of Humor", published 1985.{{sfn|Raskin|1985}} While being a variant on the more general concepts of the [[Theories of humor#Incongruity theory|incongruity theory of humour]], it is the first theory to identify its approach as exclusively linguistic. The [[Theories of humor#Script-based semantic theory of humor|Script-based Semantic Theory of Humour]] (SSTH) begins by identifying two linguistic conditions which make a text funny. It then goes on to identify the mechanisms involved in creating the punchline. This theory established the semantic/pragmatic foundation of humour as well as the humour competence of speakers.<ref group=note>i.e. The necessary and sufficient conditions for a text to be funny</ref>{{sfn|Attardo|2001|p=114}}

Several years later the SSTH was incorporated into a more expansive theory of jokes put forth by Raskin and his colleague Salvatore Attardo. In the [[Theories of humor#General theory of verbal humor|General Theory of Verbal Humour]], the SSTH was relabelled as a Logical Mechanism (LM) (referring to the mechanism which connects the different linguistic scripts in the joke) and added to five other independent Knowledge Resources (KR). Together these six KRs could now function as a multi-dimensional descriptive label for any piece of humorous text.

Linguistics has developed further methodological tools which can be applied to jokes: [[discourse analysis]] and [[conversation analysis]] of joking. Both of these subspecialties within the field focus on "naturally occurring" language use, i.e. the analysis of real (usually recorded) conversations. One of these studies has already been discussed above, where Harvey Sacks describes in detail the sequential organisation in telling a single joke.{{sfn|Sacks|1974}} Discourse analysis emphasises the entire context of social joking, the social interaction which cradles the words.