Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Groundhog Day (film)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Aftermath=== [[File:Recent photo of Richard A. Lupoff.jpg|thumb|Author [[Richard A. Lupoff]] threatened legal action against the filmmakers, alleging that they had copied his own time loop-based story "[[12:01 P.M.]]"]] Despite its relative success, a sequel was ruled out by November 1993.<ref name="Sequel" /> ''Groundhog Day'' was one of the films credited with helping to reverse Columbia's failures at the box office, alongside the 1992 films ''[[Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992 film)|Bram Stoker's Dracula]]'', ''[[A Few Good Men]]'' and ''[[A League of Their Own]]''.<ref name="LATimesFortunes" /> Shortly after its release, author [[Richard A. Lupoff]] threatened legal action against the filmmakers, alleging the film copied his short story "[[12:01 P.M.]]" and its associated 1990 [[12:01 PM (1990 film)|short film adaptation]] about a man stuck in a time loop. The case was never formally filed as the film's production company refused to support legal action.<ref name="VultureRubin" />{{sfn|Gilbey|2004|p=14}} Similarly, author Leon Arden attempted legal action, claiming the film plagiarized his novel ''One Fine Day'', which he had unsuccessfully pitched as a script to Columbia Pictures, about a man repeating April 15. The judge ruled against Arden.{{sfn|Gilbey|2004|p=14}}<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/An-Author-s-Cautionary-Tale-16869615.php |title=An Author's Cautionary Tale |access-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204133342/https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/An-Author-s-Cautionary-Tale-16869615.php |url-status=dead}}</ref> Murray initially hated the finished ''Groundhog Day''.<ref name="ReadersDigest" /> In a 1993 interview, he said that he wanted to focus on the comedy and the underlying theme of people repeating their lives out of fear of change. Ramis wanted to focus on the redeeming power of love. Even so, Murray agreed that Ramis had ultimately been right to do so.<ref name="PhillyBeast" /> The film marked the end of Ramis and Murray's nearly 20-year long partnership that among other things, had created films like ''Caddyshack'', ''[[Stripes (film)|Stripes]]'' (1981), and ''Ghostbusters''. After filming concluded, Murray stopped speaking to Ramis. He never contacted Ramis, and refused to speak about him in interviews.<ref name="new yorker" /> Ramis openly spoke about Murray, both criticizing him and discussing his dreams where the pair were once again friends.<ref name="uproxx rift" /><ref name="ReadersDigest" /> Some of their close acquaintances, including producer [[Michael Shamberg]], speculated that Murray had grown disillusioned with the assumption that his best work only came in collaboration with Ramis, or that Ramis was responsible for Murray's public persona.<ref name="new yorker" /><ref name="uproxx rift" /> Ramis said that he could make Murray as funny as possible, and in return, Murray's improvisational skills could save even the most lackluster of scripts.<ref name="uproxx rift" /> Murray felt that ''Groundhog Day'' had given him an opportunity to showcase a different side of himself. He admitted that he was bothered by his perception that his previous films focused on jokes without offering a deeper subtext. Even so, he said that he had found solace in meeting the people entertained by his work.<ref name="PhillyBeast" /> Ramis believed that Murray's dramatic turns in films like ''[[Lost in Translation (film)|Lost in Translation]]'' (2003) revealed more about Murray than anything else. Speaking in 2009, Ramis said that he thought Murray had grown tired of being the manic, energetic person carrying a film, and wanted to explore his potential.<ref name="AVClubRamis" /> Ramis reached out to Murray to cast him in his 2005 black comedy ''[[The Ice Harvest]]''. Murray's brother Brian declined on his behalf. When Ramis enquired further, Brian said that Murray never discussed Ramis. Except for a few brief exchanges at public events, the pair did not speak for nearly two decades.<ref name="new yorker" /> They reunited only in the final few months of Ramis's life in 2014.<ref name="Varietyat25" /><ref name="VultureMemoir" /> Rubin said that Murray and his brother now speak fondly of Ramis.<ref name="Varietyat25" /> Rubin was in high demand as a screenwriter but retained his desire to tell original stories and refused to tell a traditional Hollywood narrative arc, as he found defying the expected premise and structure the most interesting part. He said that studios wanted him to simply put his spin on a conventional story. Eventually, the offers stopped coming. He continued to write scripts, but none progressed. In a 2017 interview, Rubin admitted some regret that ''Groundhog Day'' remained his biggest success.<ref name="VultureRubin" />
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Groundhog Day (film)
(section)
Add topic