Editing Fingerprint (section)

== Validity ==
[[File:Figure 1 The workflow for latent print analysis for law enforcement investigations (51295965347).jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|Latent fingerprint analysis process]]
Fingerprints collected at a crime scene, or on items of evidence from a crime, have been used in [[forensic science]] to identify suspects, victims and other persons who touched a surface. Fingerprint identification emerged as an important system within police agencies in the late 19th century, when it replaced anthropometric measurements as a more reliable method for identifying persons having a prior record, often under a false name, in a criminal record repository.<ref name= ashbaugh1 /> Fingerprinting has served all governments worldwide during the past 100 years or so to provide identification of criminals. Fingerprints are the fundamental tool in every police agency for the identification of people with a criminal history.<ref name= ashbaugh1 />

The validity of forensic fingerprint evidence has been challenged by academics, judges and the media. In the [[United States]] fingerprint examiners have not developed uniform standards for the identification of an individual based on matching fingerprints. In some countries where fingerprints are also used in criminal investigations, fingerprint examiners are required to match a number of ''identification points'' before a match is accepted. In England 16 identification points are required and in France 12, to match two fingerprints and identify an individual. Point-counting methods have been challenged by some fingerprint examiners because they focus solely on the location of particular characteristics in fingerprints that are to be matched. Fingerprint examiners may also uphold the ''one dissimilarity doctrine'', which holds that if there is one dissimilarity between two fingerprints, the fingerprints are not from the same finger. Furthermore, academics have argued that the [[per-comparison error rate|error rate]] in matching fingerprints has not been adequately studied and it has even been argued that fingerprint evidence has no secure [[statistical]] foundation.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Research has been conducted into whether experts can objectively focus on feature information in fingerprints without being misled by extraneous information, such as context.<ref name="fsijournal.org"/>

Fingerprints can theoretically be forged and planted at crime scenes.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Mayo|first=Kristi|date=2003|title=Latent-Fingerprint Fabrication: Simple Steps to Prevent Fabrication and Ensure the Integrity of Legitimate Prints|url=https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/latent-fingerprint-fabrication-simple-steps-prevent-fabrication-and|journal=Evidence Technology Magazine|pages=26–29|access-date=May 4, 2022|archive-date=December 7, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221207040120/https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/latent-fingerprint-fabrication-simple-steps-prevent-fabrication-and|url-status=live}}</ref>