Editing Ambrose (section)

=== Augustine ===
Ambrose studied theology with [[Simplician]], a [[presbyter]] of Rome.{{sfn|Grieve|1911|p=798}} Using his excellent knowledge of Greek, which was then rare in the West, Ambrose studied the Old Testament and Greek authors like [[Philo]], [[Origen]], [[Athanasius]], and [[Basil of Caesarea]], with whom he was also exchanging letters.<ref>{{Citation | editor-last = Schaff | url = http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf208.ix.cxcviii.html | title = Letter of Basil to Ambrose | publisher = Christian Classics Ethereal library | access-date = 8 December 2012}}</ref> Ambrose became a famous rhetorician whom [[Augustine]] came to hear speak. Augustine wrote in his ''[[Confessions (Augustine)|Confessions]]'' that Faustus, the Manichean rhetorician, was a more impressive speaker, but the content of Ambrose's sermons began to affect Augustine's faith. Augustine sought guidance from Ambrose and again records in his ''Confessions'' that Ambrose was too busy to answer his questions. In a passage of Augustine's ''Confessions'' in which Augustine wonders why he could not share his burden with Ambrose, he comments: "Ambrose himself I esteemed a happy man, as the world counted happiness, because great personages held him in honour. Only his celibacy appeared to me a painful burden."<ref name="AugustineOnAmbrose">Augustine. ''Confessions'' Book Six, Chapter Three.</ref> Simplician regularly met with Augustine, however, and Augustine writes of Simplician's "fatherly affection" for him. It was Simplician who introduced Augustine to Christian Neoplatonism.{{sfn| Gafford II|2015|pp=20-21}} It is commonly understood in the Christian tradition that Ambrose baptized Augustine.

In this same passage of [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine's]] ''[[Confessions (Augustine)|Confessions]]'' is an anecdote which bears on the history of reading:
{{blockquote |When [Ambrose] read, his eyes scanned the page and his heart sought out the meaning, but his voice was silent and his tongue was still. Anyone could approach him freely and guests were not commonly announced, so that often, when we came to visit him, we found him reading like this in silence, for he never read aloud.<ref name="AugustineOnAmbrose" />}}

This is a celebrated passage in modern scholarly discussion. The practice of reading to oneself without vocalizing the text was less common in antiquity than it has since become. In a culture that set a high value on oratory and public performances of all kinds, in which the production of books was very labour-intensive, the majority of the population was illiterate, and where those with the leisure to enjoy literary works also had slaves to read for them, written texts were more likely to be seen as scripts for recitation than as vehicles of silent reflection. However, there is also evidence that [[silent reading]] did occur in antiquity and that it was not generally regarded as unusual.<ref>{{cite news | url = https://www.theguardian.com/books/2006/jul/29/featuresreviews.guardianreview27 | location=London | work=The Guardian | title=Read my lips | first=James | last=Fenton | date=28 July 2006}}</ref>{{sfn|Gavrilov|1997|p=56–73, esp. 70–71}}{{sfn|Burnyeat|1997|pp=74-76}}