Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Non-governmental organization
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Economic theory == The question whether a public project should be owned by an NGO or by the government has been studied in economics using the tools of the [[Incomplete contracts|incomplete contracting]] theory. According to this theory, not every detail of a relationship between decision makers can be contractually specified. Hence, in the future, the parties will bargain with each other to adapt their relationship to changing circumstances. Ownership matters because it determines the parties' willingness to make non-contractible investments. In the context of private firms, [[Oliver Hart (economist)|Oliver Hart]] has shown that the party with the more important investment task should be owner.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Hart|first=Oliver D.|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/32703648|title=Firms, contracts, and financial structure|date=1995|publisher=Clarendon Press|isbn=0-19-828881-6|location=Oxford|oclc=32703648}}</ref> Yet, Besley and Ghatak have argued that in the context of public projects the investment technology does not matter.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Besley|first1=Timothy|last2=Ghatak|first2=Maitreesh|date=2001|title=Government Versus Private Ownership of Public Goods|url=https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/116/4/1343/1903229|journal=The Quarterly Journal of Economics|language=en|volume=116|issue=4|pages=1343β1372|doi=10.1162/003355301753265598|s2cid=39187118|issn=0033-5533}}</ref> Specifically, even when the government is the key investor, ownership by an NGO is optimal if and only if the NGO has a larger valuation of the project than the government. However, the general validity of this argument has been questioned by follow-up research. In particular, ownership by the party with the larger valuation need not be optimal when the public good is partially excludable,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Francesconi|first1=Marco|last2=Muthoo|first2=Abhinay|date=2011|title=Control Rights in Complex Partnerships|url=https://academic.oup.com/jeea/article/9/3/551/2298423|journal=Journal of the European Economic Association|language=en|volume=9|issue=3|pages=551β589|doi=10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01017.x|issn=1542-4766}}</ref> when both NGO and government may be indispensable,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Halonen-Akatwijuka|first=Maija|date=2012|title=Nature of human capital, technology and ownership of public goods|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272712000862|journal=Journal of Public Economics|series=Fiscal Federalism|language=en|volume=96|issue=11|pages=939β945|doi=10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.07.005|s2cid=154075467 |issn=0047-2727|hdl=1983/9197910f-4a3f-4ff3-8d8a-20a204ec2dda|hdl-access=free}}</ref> or when the NGO and the government have different bargaining powers.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Schmitz|first=Patrick W.|date=2013|title=Incomplete contracts and optimal ownership of public goods|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517651200540X|journal=Economics Letters|language=en|volume=118|issue=1|pages=94β96|doi=10.1016/j.econlet.2012.09.033|s2cid=53520873|issn=0165-1765}}</ref> Moreover, the investment technology can matter for the optimal ownership structure when there are bargaining frictions,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Schmitz|first=Patrick W.|date=2015|title=Government versus private ownership of public goods: The role of bargaining frictions|journal=Journal of Public Economics|language=en|volume=132|pages=23β31|doi=10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.09.009|s2cid=155401327|issn=0047-2727|doi-access=free}}</ref> when the parties interact repeatedly<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Halonen-Akatwijuka|first1=Maija|last2=Pafilis|first2=Evagelos|date=2020|title=Common ownership of public goods|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016726812030370X|journal=Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization|language=en|volume=180|pages=555β578|doi=10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.002|s2cid=169842255|issn=0167-2681|hdl=1983/d4ab15e6-27ed-40ce-ae87-62d296e07181|hdl-access=free}}</ref> or when the parties are asymmetrically informed.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Schmitz|first=Patrick W.|date=2021|title=Optimal ownership of public goods under asymmetric information|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047272721000608|journal=Journal of Public Economics|language=en|volume=198|pages=104424|doi=10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104424|s2cid=236397476|issn=0047-2727}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Schmitz |first=Patrick W. |date=2024 |title=When should the government own the physical assets needed to provide public goods? |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165176524003148 |journal=Economics Letters |language=en |volume=241 |pages=111830 |doi=10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111830}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Non-governmental organization
(section)
Add topic