Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Pigeonhole principle
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Quantum mechanics== [[Yakir Aharonov]] et al. presented arguments that [[quantum mechanics]] may violate the pigeonhole principle, and proposed [[Interferometry|interferometric]] experiments to test the pigeonhole principle in quantum mechanics.<ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.1073/pnas.1522411112| pmid=26729862| pmc=4725468|title = Quantum violation of the pigeonhole principle and the nature of quantum correlations| journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences| volume=113| issue=3| pages=532β535|year = 2016|last1 = Aharonov|first1 = Yakir| last2=Colombo| first2=Fabrizio| last3=Popescu| first3=Sandu| last4=Sabadini| first4=Irene|author4-link=Irene Sabadini| last5=Struppa| first5=Daniele C.| last6=Tollaksen| first6=Jeff| bibcode=2016PNAS..113..532A| doi-access=free}}</ref> Later research has called this conclusion into question.<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://physicsworld.com/a/quantum-pigeonholes-are-not-paradoxical-after-all-say-physicists/ |title = Quantum pigeonholes are not paradoxical after all, say physicists|date = 8 January 2015}}</ref><ref name="Rae Forgan 2014">{{cite arXiv | last1=Rae | first1=Alastair | last2=Forgan | first2=Ted | title=On the implications of the Quantum-Pigeonhole Effect | date=2014-12-03 | class=quant-ph | eprint=1412.1333 }}</ref> In a January 2015 [[arXiv]] preprint, researchers Alastair Rae and Ted Forgan at the University of Birmingham performed a theoretical [[wave function]] analysis, employing the standard pigeonhole principle, on the flight of electrons at various energies through an [[interferometer]]. If the electrons had no interaction strength at all, they would each produce a single, perfectly circular peak. At high interaction strength, each electron produces four distinct peaks, for a total of 12 peaks on the detector; these peaks are the result of the four possible interactions each electron could experience (alone, together with the first other particle only, together with the second other particle only, or all three together). If the interaction strength was fairly low, as would be the case in many real experiments, the deviation from a zero-interaction pattern would be nearly indiscernible, much smaller than the [[lattice spacing]] of atoms in solids, such as the detectors used for observing these patterns. This would make it very difficult or impossible to distinguish a weak-but-nonzero interaction strength from no interaction whatsoever, and thus give an illusion of three electrons that did not interact despite all three passing through two paths.{{Citation needed|date=February 2025}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Pigeonhole principle
(section)
Add topic