Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Noble savage
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Supporters of primitivism === In "The Prehistory of Warfare: Misled by Ethnography" (2006), the researchers Jonathan Haas and Matthew Piscitelli challenged the idea that the human species is innately disposed towards being aggressive or is inclined to engage in violent conflict and propose rather that warfare is an occasional activity by a society and is not an inherent part of human culture.<ref name="Haas2013">See: {{cite book|first1=Jonathan|last1=Haas|url=https://www.academia.edu/2968441|title=War, Peace, and Human Nature: The Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views|first2=Matthew|last2=Piscitelli|date=2013|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0190232467|editor-first=Douglas P.|editor-last=Fry|location=New York|pages=168β190|entry=The Prehistory of Warfare: Misled by Ethnography}}</ref> Moreover, the [[UNESCO]]'s [[Seville Statement on Violence]] (1986) specifically rejects claims that the human propensity towards violence has a genetic basis.<ref>{{cite web|last=Johnson|first=Eric Michael|date=19 June 2012|title=The Better Bonobos of Our Nature|url=https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/primate-diaries/the-better-bonobos-of-our-nature/|access-date=22 June 2021|website=Scientific American}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Baldwin|first=Melinda|date=16 June 2019|title=The Search for What Makes Us Human: The Killer Ape Account of the Mid-20th Century|url=https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-search-for-what-makes-us-human-the-killer-ape-account-of-the-mid-20th-century/|access-date=22 June 2021|website=Los Angeles Review of Books}}</ref> [[Anarcho-primitivism|Anarcho-primitivists]], such as the philosopher [[John Zerzan]], rely upon a strong [[ethical dualism]] between Anarcho-primitivism and [[civilization]]; hence, "life before domestication [and] agriculture was, in fact, largely one of leisure, intimacy with nature, sensual wisdom, sexual equality, and health."<ref name="FuturePrimitive">{{cite web|title=John Zerzan β Future Primitive|url=http://www.primitivism.com/future-primitive.htm|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090402072021/http://www.primitivism.com/future-primitive.htm|archive-date=2 April 2009|access-date=13 November 2011|publisher=Primitivism.com}}</ref> Zerzan's claims about the moral superiority of primitive societies are based on a certain reading of the works of anthropologists, such as [[Marshall Sahlins]] and [[Richard Borshay Lee]], wherein the anthropologic category of ''[[Urgesellschaft|primitive society]]'' is restricted to hunter-gatherer societies who have no domesticated animals or agriculture, e.g. the stable [[social hierarchy]] of the American Indians of the north-west North America, who live from fishing and foraging, is attributed to having domesticated dogs and the cultivation of tobacco, that animal husbandry and agriculture equal civilization.<ref name="FuturePrimitive" /><ref name="RunningOnEmptiness">{{cite web|title=John Zerzan β Running on Emptiness: The Failure of Symbolic Thought|url=http://www.primitivism.com/emptiness.htm|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090131081232/http://primitivism.com/emptiness.htm|archive-date=31 January 2009|access-date=13 November 2011|publisher=Primitivism.com}}</ref> In anthropology, the argument has been made that key tenets of the myth of the noble savage idea inform cultural investments in places seemingly removed from the Tropics, such as the Mediterranean and specifically Greece, during the debt crisis by European institutions (such as documenta)<!-- What is "documenta"? Is this a typo? Clarification is needed. --> and by various commentators who found Greece to be a positive inspiration for resistance to austerity policies and the neoliberalism of the EU<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kalantzis |first1=Konstantinos |title=The Indigenous Sublime Rethinking Orientalism and Desire from documenta 14 to Highland Crete |journal=Current Anthropology |doi=10.1086/728171 |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/728171?journalCode=ca}}</ref> These commentators' positive embrace of the periphery (their mythical noble savage ideal) is the other side of the mainstream views, also dominant during that period, that stereotyped Greece and the South as lazy and corrupt.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Noble savage
(section)
Add topic