Editing Michif (section)

===Liaison consonants===
In French, a [[Liaison (French)|liaison]] is used to bridge the gap between word-final and word-initial vowel sounds. Whether liaison still exists in Michif is a much discussed theoretical issue. Scholars such as Bakker (1997),<ref>Bakker, P. 1997. A Language of our own. The genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis. Oxford, Oxford University Press.</ref> Rhodes (1986),<ref>Rhodes, R. 1986. Métchif: A second look. In Actes du Dix-septième Congrès des Algonquinistes, ed. W. Cowan, Ottawa, Carleton University Press, p. 287-296.</ref> and Rosen (2007)<ref>Rosen, N. 2007.  Domains in Michif phonology. PhD thesis, University of Toronto.</ref> have suggested that liaison no longer exists in Michif and that all words that etymologically began with a vowel in French now begin with a consonant, the latter resulting from a variety of sources, including a liaison consonant. Their arguments are based on the fact that the expected liaison consonant (for example, {{IPA|/n/}}) will not show up and instead, the consonant will be {{IPA|/z/}}, as in {{Lang|crg|in zur}} 'a bear' The above authors cite over a dozen words with an unexpected initial consonant. Papen (2003, 2014)<ref>Papen, R. 2003. 'Michif: One phonology or two?', in Y. Chung, C. Gillon, and Wodjak (eds) Proceedings of the Eight Workshop on the Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas, University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics 12, p.47-58; Papen, R. 2014. 'La liaison en mitchif : un cas d’acquisition incomplète fossilisée?' in C. Soum-Favaro, A. Coquillon and J.-P. Chevrot (eds.), Liaison : Approches contemporaines. Berlin, Peter Lang, p. 213-238.</ref> has countered this argument by showing that, statistically, the vast majority of so-called initial consonants in Michif reflect the expected liaison consonant and that only about 13% of so-called initial consonants are unexpected. Moreover, Papen points out that one of the so-called initial consonant is {{IPA|/l/}}, which in nearly all cases, represents the elided definite article {{Lang|crg|l}} (from {{Lang|crg|li}}), in which case it cannot be a liaison consonant, since liaison consonants may not have grammatical or semantic meaning. Thus in a sequence such as {{Lang|crg|larb}} the meaning is not simply 'tree' but 'the tree', where initial {{Lang|crg|l}} has the meaning of 'the', and {{IPA|/l/}} is initial only in a phonetic sense, but not in a phonological one, since it represents a distinct morpheme from {{Lang|crg|arb}}, and thus {{Lang|crg|arb}} must be considered phonologically vowel-initial.

{| class="wikitable"

|+Liaison consonants in Michif<ref name="Barkwell" />
|- align="center"
!French !! Michif !! English
|-
| {{Lang|fr|arbre}} || {{Lang|crg|zarbr}} || 'tree'
|-
| {{Lang|fr|étoile}} || {{Lang|crg|zetwel}} || 'star'
|-
| {{Lang|fr|œuf}} || {{Lang|crg|zoeuf}} || 'egg'
|-
| {{Lang|fr|os}} || {{Lang|crg|zo}} || 'bone'
|-
| {{Lang|fr|oignon}} || {{Lang|crg|zawyoun}} || 'onion'
|}