Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Fokker–Planck equation
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Particular cases with known solution and inversion=== In [[mathematical finance]] for [[volatility smile]] modeling of options via [[local volatility]], one has the problem of deriving a diffusion coefficient <math>{\sigma}(\mathbf{X}_t,t)</math> consistent with a probability density obtained from market option quotes. The problem is therefore an inversion of the Fokker–Planck equation: Given the density f(x,t) of the option underlying ''X'' deduced from the option market, one aims at finding the local volatility <math>{\sigma}(\mathbf{X}_t,t)</math> consistent with ''f''. This is an [[inverse problem]] that has been solved in general by Dupire (1994, 1997) with a non-parametric solution.<ref>[[Bruno Dupire]] (1994) Pricing with a Smile. ''Risk Magazine'', January, 18–20.</ref><ref>[[Bruno Dupire]] (1997) Pricing and Hedging with Smiles. Mathematics of Derivative Securities. Edited by M.A.H. Dempster and S.R. Pliska, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 103–111. {{ISBN|0-521-58424-8}}.</ref> Brigo and Mercurio (2002, 2003) propose a solution in parametric form via a particular local volatility <math>{\sigma}(\mathbf{X}_t,t)</math> consistent with a solution of the Fokker–Planck equation given by a [[mixture model]].<ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1142/S0219024902001511| year = 2002| last1 = Brigo | first1 = D.| last2 = Mercurio| first2 = Fabio| title = Lognormal-Mixture Dynamics and Calibration to Market Volatility Smiles| journal = International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance| volume = 5| issue = 4| pages = 427–446| citeseerx = 10.1.1.210.4165}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1088/1469-7688/3/3/303| title = Alternative asset-price dynamics and volatility smile| year = 2003| last1 = Brigo | first1 = D.| last2 = Mercurio | first2 = F.| last3 = Sartorelli | first3 = G.| journal = Quantitative Finance| volume = 3| issue = 3| pages = 173–183| s2cid = 154069452}}</ref> More information is available also in Fengler (2008),<ref>Fengler, M. R. (2008). Semiparametric Modeling of Implied Volatility, 2005, Springer Verlag, {{ISBN|978-3-540-26234-3}}</ref> Gatheral (2008),<ref>[[Jim Gatheral]] (2008). The Volatility Surface. Wiley and Sons, {{ISBN|978-0-471-79251-2}}.</ref> and Musiela and Rutkowski (2008).<ref>Marek Musiela, Marek Rutkowski. ''Martingale Methods in Financial Modelling'', 2008, 2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag, {{ISBN|978-3-540-20966-9}}.</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Fokker–Planck equation
(section)
Add topic