Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Brown v. Board of Education
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==''Brown III''== In 1978, Topeka attorneys Richard Jones, Joseph Johnson and Charles Scott Jr. (son of the original ''Brown'' team member), with assistance from the [[American Civil Liberties Union]], persuaded Linda Brown Smith—who now had her own children in Topeka schools—to be a plaintiff in reopening ''Brown''. They were concerned that the Topeka Public Schools' policy of "open enrollment" had led to and would lead to further segregation. They also believed that with a choice of open enrollment, white parents would shift their children to "preferred" schools that would create both predominantly African-American and predominantly European-American schools within the district. The district court reopened the ''Brown'' case after a 25-year hiatus, but denied the plaintiffs' request finding the schools "unitary". In 1989, a three-judge panel of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit|Tenth Circuit]] on a 2–1 vote found that the vestiges of segregation remained with respect to student and staff assignment.<ref>{{cite court |litigants=Brown v. Board of Education |vol=892 |reporter=F.2d |opinion=851 |court=10th Cir. |date=1989 |url=https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/892/851/72610/ |access-date=2018-05-15 }}</ref> In 1993, the Supreme Court denied the appellant School District's request for ''[[certiorari]]'' and returned the case to District Court Judge Richard Rodgers for implementation of the Tenth Circuit's mandate. After a 1994 plan was approved and a bond issue passed, additional elementary magnet schools were opened and district attendance plans redrawn, which resulted in the Topeka schools meeting court standards of racial balance by 1998. Unified status was eventually granted to [[Topeka Unified School District No. 501]] on July 27, 1999.<ref>{{cite court |litigants=Brown v. Unified School Dist. No. 501 |vol=56 |reporter=F. Supp. 2d |opinion=1212 |court=D. Kan. |date=1999 |url=https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/56/1212/2449313/ |access-date=2018-05-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180516015146/https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/56/1212/2449313/ |url-status=live }}</ref> One of the new [[magnet schools]] is named after the Scott family attorneys for their role in the ''Brown'' case and civil rights.<ref>[https://www2.topeka.k12.ks.us/scott/history.htm ''Topeka Public Schools Desegregation History: "The Naming of Scott Computer Technology Magnet"''] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071001021319/https://www2.topeka.k12.ks.us/scott/history.htm |date=October 1, 2007 }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Brown v. Board of Education
(section)
Add topic