Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
State (polity)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Modern state=== {{See also|Bureaucracy|Constitution|Corporation|Globalization|Neoliberalism}} Cultural and national homogenization figured prominently in the rise of the modern state system. Since the absolutist period, states have largely been organized on a [[nation]]al basis. The concept of a national state, however, is not synonymous with [[nation state]]. Even in the most [[ethnic]]ally homogeneous societies there is not always a complete correspondence between state and [[nation]], hence the active role often taken by the state to promote [[nationalism]] through an emphasis on shared symbols and national identity.<ref name="Breuilly" /> Charles Tilly argues that the number of total states in Western Europe declined rapidly from the Late Middle Ages to Early Modern Era during a process of [[state formation]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Tilly |first1=Charles |title=Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1992 |date=1992 |publisher=Blackwell |isbn=978-1-55786-067-5 |oclc=1148616089 |page=44 |url=https://archive.org/details/coercioncapitale0000till }}</ref> Other research has disputed whether such a decline took place.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Abramson |first1=Scott F |title=The Economic Origins of the Territorial State |journal=International Organization |date=2017 |volume=71 |issue=1 |pages=97–130 |doi=10.1017/S0020818316000308 |s2cid=22432480 |doi-access=free }}</ref> For [[Edmund Burke]] (Dublin 1729 - Beaconsfield 1797), "a state without the means of some change is without the means of its conservation" (Reflections on the Revolution in France).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/%C3%89tat/31318|title=Définitions : État - Dictionnaire de français Larousse|first=Éditions|last=Larousse|website=www.larousse.fr|accessdate=17 March 2023}}</ref> According to [[Hendrik Spruyt]], the modern state is different from its predecessor polities in two main aspects: (1) Modern states have a greater capacity to intervene in their societies, and (2) Modern states are buttressed by the principle of international legal sovereignty and the judicial equivalence of states.<ref name="Spruyt-2002">{{cite journal |last1=Spruyt |first1=Hendrik |title=The Origins, Development, and Possible Decline of the Modern State |journal=Annual Review of Political Science |date=June 2002 |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=127–149 |doi=10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.101501.145837 |s2cid=145637947 |doi-access=free }}</ref> The two features began to emerge in the Late Middle Ages but the modern state form took centuries to come firmly into fruition.<ref name="Spruyt-2002" /> Other aspects of modern states is that they tend to be organized as unified national polities, and that they have [[Rational-legal authority|rational-legal bureaucracies]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Thomas |first1=George M. |last2=Meyer |first2=John W. |title=The Expansion of the State |journal=Annual Review of Sociology |date=August 1984 |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=461–482 |doi=10.1146/annurev.so.10.080184.002333 }}</ref> Sovereign equality did not become fully global until after World War II amid decolonization.<ref name="Spruyt-2002" /> [[Adom Getachew]] writes that it was not until the 1960 [[Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples]] that the international legal context for popular sovereignty was instituted.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Getachew |first1=Adom |title=Worldmaking after Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination |date=2019 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-17915-5 |jstor=j.ctv3znwvg |pages=73–74 |doi=10.2307/j.ctv3znwvg }}</ref> Historians [[Jane Burbank]] and [[Frederick Cooper (historian)|Frederick Cooper]] argue that "[[Westphalian sovereignty]]" – the notion that bounded, unitary states interact with equivalent states – "has more to do with 1948 than 1648."<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Burbank |first1=Jane |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=y7B9euuLEkUC |title=Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference |last2=Cooper |first2=Frederick |date=2010 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-12708-8 |pages=182 |language=en}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
State (polity)
(section)
Add topic