Editing Richard III (play) (section)

===Richard as anti-hero===
Throughout the play, Richard's character constantly changes and shifts and, in doing so, alters the dramatic structure of the story.

Richard immediately establishes a connection with the audience with his opening monologue. In the soliloquy he admits his amorality to the audience but at the same time treats them as if they were co-conspirators in his plotting; one may well be enamored of his rhetoric<ref>Sila Senlen. "Chapter 3: Rhetoric in the Hands of the Machiavellian Villain: William Shakespeare's ''Richard III''". In ''Words as Swords: Verbal Violence as a Construction of Authority in Renaissance and Contemporary English Drama''. Stuttgart: ibidem verlag, 2009. pp. 60–95.</ref> while being appalled by his actions. Richard shows off his wit in Act&nbsp;I, as seen in the interchanges with Lady Anne (Act&nbsp;I, Scene&nbsp;II) and his brother Clarence (Act&nbsp;I, Scene&nbsp;I). In his dialogues in Act&nbsp;I, Richard knowingly refers to thoughts he has only previously shared with the audience to keep the audience attuned to him and his objectives. In 1.1, Richard tells the audience in a soliloquy how he plans to claw his way to the throne—killing his brother Clarence as a necessary step to get there. However, Richard pretends to be Clarence's friend, falsely reassuring him by saying, "I will deliver you, or else lie for you" (1.1.115); which the audience knows—and Richard tells the audience after Clarence's exit—is the exact opposite of what he plans to do.<ref name=Mooney/>{{rp|p.37|date=November 2012}} Scholar Michael E. Mooney describes Richard as occupying a "figural position"; he is able to move in and out of it by talking with the audience on one level, and interacting with other characters on another.<ref name=Mooney/>{{rp|p.33|date=November 2012}}

Each scene in Act I is book-ended by Richard directly addressing the audience. This action on Richard's part not only keeps him in control of the dramatic action of the play, but also of how the audience sees him: in a somewhat positive light, or as the protagonist.<ref name=Mooney/>{{rp|p.32–33|date=November 2012}} Richard actually embodies the dramatic character of "Vice" from [[medieval]] [[morality play]]s—with which Shakespeare was very familiar from his time—with his "impish-to-fiendish humour". Like Vice, Richard is able to render what is ugly and evil—his thoughts and aims, his view of other characters—into what is charming and amusing for the audience.<ref name=Mooney/>{{rp|p.38|date=November 2012}}

In the earlier acts of the play, too, the role of the antagonist is filled by that of the old Lancastrian queen, Margaret, who is reviled by the Yorkists and whom Richard manipulates and condemns in Act&nbsp;I, Scene&nbsp;III.

However, after Act I, the number and quality of Richard's [[asides]] to the audience decrease significantly, as well as multiple scenes are interspersed that do not include Richard at all,<ref name=Mooney/>{{rp|p.44|date=November 2012}} but average Citizens (Act&nbsp;II, Scene&nbsp;III), or the Duchess of York and Clarence's children (Act&nbsp;II, Scene&nbsp;II), who are as moral as Richard is evil. Without Richard guiding the audience through the dramatic action, the audience is left to evaluate for itself what is going on. In Act&nbsp;IV, Scene&nbsp;IV, after the murder of the two young princes and the ruthless murder of Lady Anne, the women of the play—Queen Elizabeth, the Duchess of York, and even Margaret—gather to mourn their state and to curse Richard; and it is difficult as the audience not to sympathise with them. When Richard enters to bargain with Queen Elizabeth for her daughter's hand—a scene whose form echoes the same rhythmically quick dialogue as the Lady Anne scene in Act I—he has lost his vivacity and playfulness for communication; it is obvious he is not the same man.<ref name=Mooney/>{{rp|p.32–33|date=November 2012}}

By the end of Act IV everyone else in the play, including Richard's own mother, the Duchess, has turned against him. He does not interact with the audience nearly as much, and the inspiring quality of his speech has declined into merely giving and requiring information. As Richard gets closer to seizing the crown, he encloses himself within the world of the play; no longer embodying his facile movement in and out of the dramatic action, he is now stuck firmly within it.<ref name=Mooney/>{{rp|p.47|date=November 2012}} It is from Act&nbsp;IV that Richard really begins his rapid decline into truly being the antagonist. Shakespeare scholar [[Stephen Greenblatt]] notes how Richard even refers to himself as "the formal Vice, Iniquity" (3.1.82), which informs the audience that he knows what his function is; but also like Vice in the morality plays, the fates will turn and get Richard in the end, which Elizabethan audiences would have recognised.<ref>{{cite book |title = Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare
  |last = Greenblatt
  |first = Stephen
  |author-link = Stephen Greenblatt
  |year = 2005
  |publisher = [[Pimlico]]
  |isbn = 978-0712600989
  |pages = 33–36
}}</ref>

In addition, the character of Richmond enters into the play in Act&nbsp;V to overthrow Richard and save the state from his tyranny, effectively being the instantaneous new protagonist. Richmond is a clear contrast to Richard's evil character, which makes the audience see him as such.<ref name=Mooney/>{{rp|p.32|date=November 2012}}