Editing Peer review (section)

==Further reading==
* Baldwin, Melinda (2018). "[[doi:10.1086/700070|Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise of "Peer Review" in the Cold War United States]]". ''Isis''. '''109''' (3): 538–558.
* {{Cite journal |last1=Lee |first1=Carole J. |last2=Sugimoto |first2=Cassidy R. |author2-link=Cassidy Sugimoto| last3=Zhang |first3=Guo |last4=Cronin |first4=Blaise |date=2013 |title=Bias in peer review |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.22784 |journal=Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology |language=en |volume=64 |issue=1 |pages=2–17 |doi=10.1002/asi.22784}}
* {{cite journal |journal=International Urogynecology Journal |volume=31 |publication-date=9 December 2019 |pages=481–483 |title=Peer Review: Single-blind, Double-blind, or All the Way-blind? |first=Toni |last=Bazi |year=2020 |issue=3 |doi=10.1007/s00192-019-04187-2|pmid=31820012 |s2cid=208869313 }}
* {{cite journal |journal=[[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America]] |volume=114 |issue=48 |orig-date=Composed October 2017 |publication-date=November 2017 |pages=12708–12713 |editor-first=Susan T. |editor-last=Fiske |editor-link=Susan T. Fiske |title=Reviewer Bias in Single- Versus Double-blind Peer Review |first1=Andrew |last1=Tomkins |first2=Min |last2=Zhang |first3=William D. |last3=Heavlin |year=2017 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1707323114|pmid=29138317 |pmc=5715744 |bibcode=2017PNAS..11412708T |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite journal |journal=[[Current Sociology]] |volume=64 |issue=5 |year=2016 |pages=691–698 |title=How Double-blind Peer Review Works and What It Takes To Be A Good Referee |first=Eloisa |last=Martín |doi=10.1177/0011392116656711 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite book |last1=Hames |first1=Irene |title=Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice |date=2007 |publisher=[[Blackwell Publishing]] |location=Oxford, UK |isbn=978-1-4051-3159-9}}