Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Mary Magdalene
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Patristic era=== [[File:Dura Europos baptistry women at the tomb.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|This fresco from the [[nave]] of the [[Dura-Europos church]] dates to {{circa|240}}{{sfn|Haskins|2005|page=59}} and contains the oldest surviving depiction of Mary Magdalene.{{sfn|Haskins|2005|pages=58β59}} She is shown alongside two other women (the third now almost completely missing due to extensive damage),{{sfn|Haskins|2005|page=59}} each holding a lit torch and a bowl of [[myrrh]], as they approach [[Tomb of Jesus|Jesus's tomb]], which is still sealed.{{sfn|Haskins|2005|pages=58β61}}]] Most of the earliest [[Church Fathers]] do not mention Mary Magdalene,{{sfn|Schaberg|2004|page=86}}{{sfn|Ehrman|2006|page=185}}{{sfn|Haskins|2005|page=90}} and those who do mention her usually only discuss her very briefly.{{sfn|Schaberg|2004|page=86}}{{sfn|Ehrman|2006|page=185}}{{sfn|Haskins|2005|page=90}} In his anti-Christian polemic ''[[The True Word]]'', written between 170 and 180, the pagan philosopher [[Celsus]] declared that Mary Magdalene was nothing more than "a hysterical female... who either dreamt in a certain state of mind and through wishful thinking had a hallucination due to some mistaken notion (an experience which has happened to thousands), or, which is more likely, wanted to impress others by telling this fantastic tale, and so by this cock-and-bull story to provide a chance for other beggars".{{sfn|Schaberg|2004|pages=84β85}} The Church Father [[Origen]] ({{circa}} 184 β {{circa}} 253) defended Christianity against this accusation in his apologetic treatise ''[[Against Celsus]]'', mentioning {{bibleverse||Matthew|28:1|9}}, which lists Mary Magdalene and "the other Mary" both seeing the resurrected Jesus, thus providing a second witness.{{sfn|Schaberg|2004|page=85}} Origen also preserves a statement from Celsus that some Christians in his day followed the teachings of a woman named "Mariamme", who is almost certainly Mary Magdalene.{{sfn|Schaberg|2004|page=87}}{{sfn|Ehrman|2006|page=256}} Origen merely dismisses this, remarking that Celsus "pours on us a heap of names".{{sfn|Schaberg|2004|page=87}} A sermon attributed to [[Hippolytus of Rome]] ({{circa}} 170 β 235) refers to Mary of Bethany and her sister [[Martha]] seeking Jesus in the garden like Mary Magdalene in {{bibleverse||John|20|9}}, indicating a conflation between Mary of Bethany and Mary Magdalene.{{sfn|Schaberg|2004|pages=85β86}} The sermon describes the conflated woman as a "second [[Eve]]" who compensates for the disobedience of the first Eve through her obedience.{{sfn|Schaberg|2004|page=86}}{{sfn|Haskins|2005|page=90}} The sermon also explicitly identifies Mary Magdalene and the other women as "apostles".{{sfn|Ehrman|2006|page=253}}{{sfn|Bock|2004|pages=143β144}} The first clear identification of Mary Magdalene as a redeemed sinner comes from [[Ephrem the Syrian]] ({{circa}} 306 β 373).{{sfn|Hooper|2005|p=81}}{{sfn|Althaus-Reid|2009|p=86}} Part of the reason for the identification of Mary Magdalene as a sinner may derive from the reputation of her birthplace, Magdala,{{sfn|Haskins|2005|page=15}} which, by the late first century, was infamous for its inhabitants' alleged vice and licentiousness.{{sfn|Haskins|2005|page=15}} In one of his preserved sayings, [[Gregory of Nyssa]] ({{circa}} 330 β 395) identifies Mary Magdalene as "the first witness to the resurrection, that she might set straight again by her faith in the resurrection, what was turned over in her transgression".{{sfn|Schaberg|2004|pages=86β87}} [[Ambrose]] ({{circa}} 340 β 397), by contrast, not only rejected the conflation of Mary Magdalene, Mary of Bethany, and the anointing sinner,{{sfn|Maisch|1998|page=44}} but even proposed that the authentic Mary Magdalene was, in fact, two separate people:{{sfn|Maisch|1998|page=44}}{{sfn|Haskins|2005|page=93}} one woman named Mary Magdalene who discovered the empty tomb and a different Mary Magdalene who saw the risen Christ.{{sfn|Maisch|1998|page=44}} [[Augustine of Hippo]] (354β430) entertained the possibility that Mary of Bethany and the unnamed sinner from Luke might be the same person,{{sfn|Haskins|2005|pages=93β94}} but did not associate Mary Magdalene with either of them.{{sfn|Haskins|2005|page=94}} Instead, Augustine praised Mary Magdalene as "unquestionably... surpassingly more ardent in her love than these other women who had administered to the Lord".{{sfn|Haskins|2005|page=94}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Mary Magdalene
(section)
Add topic