Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Hugh Trevor-Roper
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==="Hitler Diaries" hoax=== The [[nadir]] of his career came in 1983, when as a director of ''[[The Times]]'', Trevor-Roper (by now [[Baron Dacre]] of Glanton) made statements that authenticated the so-called [[Hitler Diaries]].<ref>{{cite book |title= Selling Hitler: The Extraordinary Story of the Con Job of the Century – The Faking of the Hitler "Diaries" |last= Harris |first= Robert |publisher= New York: Pantheon |date= 1986 |isbn= 9780394553368 |url-access= registration |url= https://archive.org/details/sellinghitler00harr }}</ref> Others were unsure: holocaust denier [[David Irving]], for example, initially decried them as forgeries but subsequently changed his mind and declared that they could be genuine, before finally stating that they were a forgery. Historians [[Gerhard Weinberg]] and [[Eberhard Jäckel]] had also expressed doubt regarding the authenticity of the diaries.<ref>Richard J. Evans, ''Telling Lies About Hitler: The Holocaust, History and the David Irving Trial'' (London, 2002), p. 25.</ref> Within two weeks, forensic scientist [[Julius Grant]] demonstrated that the diaries were forgeries. The ensuing fiasco gave Trevor-Roper's enemies the opportunity to criticise him openly, while Trevor-Roper's initial endorsement of the diaries raised questions about his integrity: ''[[The Sunday Times]]'', a newspaper to which he regularly contributed book reviews and of which he was an independent director, had already paid a considerable sum for the right to serialise the diaries if and only if they were genuine.{{citation needed|date=March 2023}} Trevor-Roper explained that he had been given assurances (that turned out to be false) about how the diaries had come into the possession of their "discoverer"{{who|date=December 2024}}, and about the age of the paper and ink used in them and of their authenticity. Nonetheless, this incident prompted the satirical magazine ''[[Private Eye]]'' to nickname him "Hugh Very-Ropey", "Lord Lucre of Claptout", or more concisely, "Lord Facre". Despite the shadow this cast over his later career, he continued to write and publish and his work remained well received.<ref>''Rowse and Trevor-Roper defined'', [[Donald Adamson]], {{cite web|url=http://www.theroselandinstitute.co.uk/html/cornish_banner_publications_14.html|title=The Cornish Banner|date=August 2014|access-date=10 September 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141101141837/http://www.theroselandinstitute.co.uk/html/cornish_banner_publications_14.html|archive-date=1 November 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Hugh Trevor-Roper
(section)
Add topic