Editing Grid plan (section)

===Financial cost===
[[File:Block Sizes and Street Length.svg|thumb|right|Block sizes and street length]]
[[File:13½ Street.jpg|thumb|right|In a numbered grid system, adding an extra street can cause confusion]]

''Street width'', or right of way (ROW), influences the amount of land that is devoted to streets, which becomes unavailable for development and therefore represents an [[opportunity cost]]. The wider the street, the higher the opportunity cost. Street width is determined by circulation and aesthetic considerations and is not dependent on the pattern configuration. Any configuration can have wide or narrow streets.

''Street length'' influences proportionately the number of street components that have to be constructed such as pavement, curbs and sidewalks, storm sewers and drains, light poles, and trees. The street length of a given area of development depends on the frequency at which streets occur which in turn depends on the length and width of a block. The higher the frequency of streets the longer is their total length. The smaller the block dimensions the higher the frequency of the streets. As the frequency of street increases so does the number of intersections. Intersections normally cost more than straight street length because they are labour-intensive and require street and traffic signage.

''Pavement width'' influences the cost by affecting the amount of materials and labour required to provide a finished road surface. Pavement width is generally based on traffic engineering considerations and is not dependent on pattern configuration. As with the street width, any pattern can have wide or narrow pavements.
Of all three factors that affect cost, street width, street length and pavement width, only street length is pattern dependent. An objective cost comparison would, therefore, rely on this variable with the full understanding that the other variables, though optional, can play a role.

Not only do these street dimension factors increase infrastructure costs and inhibit land utilization and by turn, affordability, but they also impact a city's economic productivity. "Street width plays a crucial role in shaping our perception of scale, influencing how distant or accessible destinations appear".<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |date=2020-01-06 |title=Some Thoughts on Narrow Streets |url=https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2015/3/17/some-thoughts-on-narrow-streets |access-date=2025-04-03 |website=Strong Towns |language=en-US}}</ref> Wider streets have less developable land within a square mile generating tax revenue (tax revenue falls) while having greater area of streets to maintain (expenses go up).<ref name=":2" /> 

Traditional orthogonal grid patterns generally have greater street frequencies than discontinuous patterns. For example, Portland's block is 200 feet × 200 feet while Miletus' is half that size and Timgad's half again (see diagram). Houston, Sacramento and Barcelona are progressively bigger reaching up to four times the area of Portland's block. New York's 1811 plan (see above) has blocks of {{convert|200|ft}}. in width and variable lengths ranging from about {{convert|500|ft}} to {{convert|900|ft}} feet. The corresponding frequency of streets for each of these block sizes affects the street length.

A simple example of a grid street pattern (see diagram) illustrates the progressive reduction in ''total'' street length (the sum of all individual street lengths) and the corresponding increase in block length. For a corresponding reduction of one, two, three and four streets within this {{convert|40|acre|ha|adj=on}} parcel, the street length is reduced from an original total of {{convert|12600|ft}} to {{convert|7800|ft}} linear feet, a 39% reduction. Simultaneously, block lengths increase from 200 × 200 feet to 1240 × 200 feet. When all five blocks have reached the ultimate size of {{convert|1240|feet}} four street lengths out of total eight have been eliminated. Block lengths of {{convert|1000|ft}} or larger rarely appear in grid plans and are not recommended as they hinder pedestrian movement (Pedestrianism, below). From the pedestrian perspective, the smaller the block is, the easier the navigation and the more direct the route. Consequently, the finer grids are preferred.

Patterns that incorporate discontinuous street types such as crescents and [[cul-de-sac|culs-de-sac]] have not, in general, regarded pedestrian movement as a priority and, consequently, have produced blocks that are usually in the {{convert|1000|ft}}  range and often exceed it. As a result, street frequency drops and so does the ''total'' street length and, therefore, the cost. In general, it is not the street pattern per se that affects costs but the frequency of streets that it either necessitates or purposely incorporates.

An inherent advantage of the orthogonal geometry of a proper grid is its tendency to yield regular lots in well-packed sequences. This maximizes the use of the land of the block; it does not, however, affect street frequency. Any frequency of orthogonal streets produces the same [[packing problems|packing]] effect. Orthogonal geometry also minimizes disputes over lot boundaries and maximizes the number of lots that could front a given street. [[John Randal]] said Manhattan's grid plan facilitated "buying, selling and improving real estate".<ref name="crabgrass" />

Another important aspect of street grids and the use of rectilinear blocks is that traffic flows of either pedestrians, cars, or both, only cross at right angles. This is an important traffic safety feature, since no one entering the intersection needs to look over their shoulder to see oncoming traffic. Any time traffic flows meet at an acute angle, someone cannot see traffic approaching them. The grid is thus a geometric response to our human physiology. It is very likely the original purpose of grid layouts comes from the Athenian Agora. Before the grid organization, markets were laid out randomly in a field with traffic approaches at odd angles. This caused carts and wagons to turn over due to frequent collisions. Laying out the market stalls into regularized rows at right angles solved this problem and was later built into the Athenian Agora and copied ever since.