Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ganymede (moon)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Origin and evolution== [[Image:Ganymede terrain.jpg|thumb|upright=1.15|A sharp boundary divides the ancient dark terrain of Nicholson Regio from the younger, finely striated bright terrain of Harpagia Sulcus.]] Ganymede probably formed by an [[accretion (astrophysics)|accretion]] in Jupiter's [[solar nebula|subnebula]], a disk of gas and dust surrounding Jupiter after its formation.<ref name="Canup2002">{{cite journal |last1=Canup |first1=Robin M. |author1-link=Robin Canup |last2=Ward |first2=William R. |title=Formation of the Galilean Satellites: Conditions of Accretion |date=2002 |volume=124 |issue=6 |pages=3404–3423 |doi=10.1086/344684 |url=http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~robin/cw02final.pdf |journal=The Astronomical Journal |bibcode=2002AJ....124.3404C |s2cid=47631608 |access-date=January 2, 2008 |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~robin/cw02final.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> The accretion of Ganymede probably took about 10,000 years,<ref name="Mosqueira2003">{{cite journal |last1=Mosqueira |first1=Ignacio |last2=Estrada |first2=Paul R |title=Formation of the regular satellites of giant planets in an extended gaseous nebula I: subnebula model and accretion of satellites |date=2003 |volume=163 |issue=1 |pages=198–231 |doi=10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00076-9 |bibcode=2003Icar..163..198M |journal=Icarus |url=https://zenodo.org/record/1259597 |access-date=August 25, 2019 |archive-date=December 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201201233143/https://zenodo.org/record/1259597 |url-status=live }}</ref> much shorter than the 100,000 years estimated for Callisto. The Jovian subnebula may have been relatively "gas-starved" when the Galilean satellites formed; this would have allowed for the lengthy accretion times required for Callisto.<ref name="Canup2002" /> In contrast, Ganymede formed closer to Jupiter, where the subnebula was denser, which explains its shorter formation timescale.<ref name="Mosqueira2003" /> This relatively fast formation prevented the escape of accretional heat, which may have led to ice melt and [[Planetary differentiation|differentiation]]: the separation of the rocks and ice. The rocks settled to the center, forming the core.<ref name="Bhatia2017"/> In this respect, Ganymede is different from Callisto, which apparently failed to melt and differentiate early due to loss of the accretional heat during its slower formation.<ref name="McKinnon2006">{{cite journal |last=McKinnon |first=William B. |title=On convection in ice I shells of outer Solar System bodies, with detailed application to Callisto |date=2006 |volume=183 |issue=2 |pages=435–450 |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2006.03.004 |bibcode=2006Icar..183..435M |journal=Icarus }}</ref> This hypothesis explains why the two Jovian moons look so dissimilar, despite their similar mass and composition.<ref name="Freeman2006" /><ref name="McKinnon2006" /> Alternative theories explain Ganymede's greater internal heating on the basis of tidal flexing<ref name="Showman2">{{cite journal |last1=Showman |first1=A. P. |last2=Malhotra |first2=R. |s2cid=55790129 |title=Tidal evolution into the Laplace resonance and the resurfacing of Ganymede |journal=[[Icarus (journal)|Icarus]] |volume=127 |issue=1 |pages=93–111 |date=March 1997 |doi=10.1006/icar.1996.5669 |bibcode=1997Icar..127...93S }}</ref> or more intense pummeling by impactors during the [[Late Heavy Bombardment]].<ref name="Baldwin">{{cite web |last=Baldwin |first=E. |title=Comet impacts explain Ganymede-Callisto dichotomy |work=[[Astronomy Now]] |date=January 25, 2010 |url=http://www.astronomynow.com/news/n1001/25galilean/ |access-date=March 1, 2010 |archive-date=January 30, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100130231918/http://www.astronomynow.com/news/n1001/25galilean/ |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name = "Phys.Org2010">{{cite web | url = https://phys.org/news/2010-01-explanation-differences-ganymede-callisto-moons.html | title = Researchers offer explanation for the differences between Ganymede and Callisto moons | date = January 24, 2010 | website = Phys.Org | access-date = February 3, 2017 | archive-date = February 3, 2017 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170203163742/https://phys.org/news/2010-01-explanation-differences-ganymede-callisto-moons.html | url-status = live }}</ref><ref name="LPI1158">{{cite conference |first1=A. C. |last1=Barr |last2=Canup |first2=R. M. |title=Origin of the Ganymede/Callisto dichotomy by impacts during an outer solar system late heavy bombardment |work=41st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2010) |date=March 2010 |location=Houston |url=http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2010/pdf/1158.pdf |access-date=March 1, 2010 |archive-date=June 5, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605044843/http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2010/pdf/1158.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Barr3">{{cite journal |last1=Barr |first1=A. C. |last2=Canup |first2=R. M. |title=Origin of the Ganymede–Callisto dichotomy by impacts during the late heavy bombardment |journal=[[Nature Geoscience]] |volume=3 |issue=March 2010 |pages=164–167 |date=January 24, 2010 |doi=10.1038/NGEO746 |bibcode=2010NatGe...3..164B |url=http://www.planetary.brown.edu/pdfs/ab19.pdf |citeseerx=10.1.1.827.982 |access-date=April 12, 2020 |archive-date=March 1, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210301065853/http://www.planetary.brown.edu/pdfs/ab19.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> In the latter case, modeling suggests that differentiation would become a [[thermal runaway|runaway process]] at Ganymede but not Callisto.<ref name="LPI1158" /><ref name="Barr3" /> After formation, Ganymede's core largely retained the heat accumulated during accretion and differentiation, only slowly releasing it to the ice mantle.<ref name="McKinnon2006" /> The mantle, in turn, transported it to the surface by convection.<ref name="Freeman2006" /> The decay of [[radioactivity|radioactive elements]] within rocks further heated the core, causing increased differentiation: an inner, iron–iron-sulfide core and a silicate mantle formed.<ref name="Hauk2006" /><ref name="McKinnon2006" /> With this, Ganymede became a fully differentiated body.<ref name="Bhatia2017" /> By comparison, the radioactive heating of undifferentiated Callisto caused convection in its icy interior, which effectively cooled it and prevented large-scale melting of ice and rapid differentiation.<ref name="Nagel2004">{{cite journal |last1=Nagel |first1=K.A |last2=Breuer |first2=D. |last3=Spohn |first3=T. |title=A model for the interior structure, evolution, and differentiation of Callisto |date=2004 |volume=169 |issue=2 |pages=402–412 |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2003.12.019 |bibcode=2004Icar..169..402N |journal=Icarus }}</ref> The convective motions in Callisto have caused only a partial separation of rock and ice.<ref name="Nagel2004" /> Today, Ganymede continues to cool slowly.<ref name="Hauk2006" /> The heat being released from its core and silicate mantle enables the subsurface ocean to exist,<ref name="Spohn2003">{{cite journal|last1=Spohn |first1=T. |last2=Schubert |first2=G. |title=Oceans in the icy Galilean satellites of Jupiter? |journal=Icarus |date=2003 |volume=161 |issue=2 |pages=456–467 |doi=10.1016/S0019-1035(02)00048-9 |url=http://lasp.colorado.edu/icymoons/europaclass/Spohn_Schubert_oceans.pdf |bibcode=2003Icar..161..456S |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080227015925/http://lasp.colorado.edu/icymoons/europaclass/Spohn_Schubert_oceans.pdf |archive-date=February 27, 2008 }}</ref> whereas the slow cooling of the liquid Fe–FeS core causes convection and supports magnetic field generation.<ref name="Hauk2006" /> The current [[heat flux]] out of Ganymede is probably higher than that out of Callisto.<ref name="McKinnon2006" /> A study from 2020 by Hirata, Suetsugu and Ohtsuki suggests that Ganymede probably was hit by a massive asteroid 4 billion years ago; an impact so violent that may have shifted the moon's axis. The study came to this conclusion analyzing images of the furrows system in the satellite's surface.<ref>{{cite journal | url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103520303158 | title='Naoyuki Hirata, Ryo Suetsugu, Keiji Ohtsuki, A global system of furrows on Ganymede indicative of their creation in a single impact event, Icarus, Volume 352, 2020, 113941,ISSN 0019-1035' | journal=Icarus | date=December 2020 | volume=352 | doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113941 | last1=Hirata | first1=Naoyuki | last2=Suetsugu | first2=Ryo | last3=Ohtsuki | first3=Keiji | hdl=20.500.14094/90007458 | arxiv=2205.05221 }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Ganymede (moon)
(section)
Add topic