Editing European Economic Area (section)

==Institutions==
{{See also|European Free Trade Association#Institutions|l1=European Free Trade Association}}

The [[EEA Joint Committee]] consists of the EEA-EFTA States plus the European Commission (representing the EU) and has the function of amending the EEA Agreement to include relevant EU legislation. An [[EEA Council]] meets twice yearly to govern the overall relationship between the EEA members.

Rather than setting up pan-EEA institutions, the activities of the EEA are regulated by the European Union institutions, as well as the [[EFTA Surveillance Authority]] and the [[EFTA Court]]. The EFTA Surveillance Authority and the EFTA Court regulate the activities of the EFTA members in respect of their obligations in the European Economic Area (EEA). The EFTA Surveillance Authority performs the European Commission's role as "guardian of the treaties" for the EFTA countries to ensure the EEA Agreement is being followed. The EFTA Court performs a similar role to the [[European Court of Justice]]'s in that it resolves disputes under the EEA Agreement.

While the ECJ and European Commission are respectively responsible for the interpretation and application of the EEA Agreement in the EU (between EU member states and within EU member states), and the EFTA Court and EFTA Surveillance Authority are likewise respectively responsible for interpreting and monitoring the application of the EEA Agreement among the EEA-EFTA states (between the EEA-EFTA states and within the EEA-EFTA states), disputes ''between'' an EU state and an EEA-EFTA state are referred to the EEA Joint Committee rather to either court. Only if the Joint Committee cannot provide a resolution within three months, would the disputing parties jointly submit to the ECJ for a ruling (if the dispute concerns provisions identical to EU law) or to arbitration (in all other cases).<ref name="governance of international agreements">{{Cite web|url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/governance.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20180124135643/https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/governance.pdf|url-status=dead|title=Internal preparatory discussions on framework for future relationship – Governance of an International Agreement p. 14|archivedate=24 January 2018}}</ref>

The original plan for the EEA lacked the EFTA Court or the EFTA Surveillance Authority, as the "EEA court" (which would be composed of five European Court of Justice members and three members from EFTA countries and which would be functionally integrated with the ECJ)<ref name="EEA Judicial System">{{cite web|url=http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/3/2/2043.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150416225924/http://ejil.org/pdfs/3/2/2043.pdf |archive-date=2015-04-16 |url-status=live |title=The EEA Judicial System and the Supreme Courts of the EFTA States|access-date=7 May 2017}}</ref> and the European Commission were to exercise those roles. However, during the negotiations for the EEA agreement, the European Court of Justice informed the [[Council of the European Union]] (Opinion 1/91) that they considered that giving the EEA court jurisdiction with respect to EU law that would be part of the EEA law, would be a violation of the treaties, and therefore the current arrangement was developed instead. After having negotiated the Surveillance Authority, the ECJ confirmed its legality in Opinion 1/92.

The EFTA Secretariat is headquartered in [[Geneva]], Switzerland. The EFTA Surveillance Authority has its headquarters in [[Brussels]], Belgium (the same location as the headquarters of the European Commission), while the EFTA Court has its headquarters in Luxembourg (the same location as the headquarters of the European Court of Justice).