Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Elo rating system
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Most accurate K-factor ==== The second major concern is the correct "{{mvar|K}}-factor" used. The chess statistician [[Jeff Sonas]] believes that the original <math>\; K = 10 \;</math> value (for players rated above 2400) is inaccurate in Elo's work. If the {{mvar|K}}-factor coefficient is set too large, there will be too much sensitivity to just a few, recent events, in terms of a large number of points exchanged in each game. And if the K-value is too low, the sensitivity will be minimal, and the system will not respond quickly enough to changes in a player's actual level of performance. Elo's original {{mvar|K}}-factor estimation was made without the benefit of huge databases and statistical evidence. Sonas indicates that a {{mvar|K}}-factor of 24 (for players rated above 2400) may be both more accurate as a predictive tool of future performance and be more sensitive to performance.<ref>A key Sonas article is {{cite news |first=Jeff |last=Sonas |title=The Sonas rating formula β better than Elo? |website=chessbase.com |url=http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=562 |access-date=2005-05-01 |archive-date=2005-03-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050305143008/http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=562 |url-status=live }}</ref> Certain Internet chess sites seem to avoid a three-level K-factor staggering based on rating range. For example, the ICC seems to adopt a global {{math|1=''K'' = 32}} except when playing against provisionally rated players. The USCF (which makes use of a [[logistic distribution]] as opposed to a [[normal distribution]]) formerly staggered the K-factor according to three main rating ranges: :{| |- ! {{mvar|K}}-factor !! Used for players with ratings ... |- style="vertical-align:top;" | <math>\; K = 32 \;</math> || below 2100 |- style="vertical-align:top;" | <math>\; K = 24 \;</math> || between 2100 and 2400 |- style="vertical-align:top;" | <math>\; K = 16 \;</math> || above 2400 |} Currently, the USCF uses a formula that calculates the {{mvar|K}}-factor based on factors including the number of games played and the player's rating. The K-factor is also reduced for high rated players if the event has shorter time controls.<ref name="uschess2020">{{cite report |title=The US Chess Rating system |date=April 24, 2017 |via=glicko.net |url=http://www.glicko.net/ratings/rating.system.pdf |access-date=16 February 2020 |archive-date=7 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200207072639/http://www.glicko.net/ratings/rating.system.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref> FIDE uses the following ranges:<ref name="FideRules">{{cite report |title=FIDE Rating Regulations effective from 1 July 2014 |date=2014-07-01 |website=FIDE Online (fide.com) |publisher=[[FIDE]] |url=http://www.fide.com/fide/handbook.html?id=172&view=article |access-date=2014-07-01 |archive-date=2014-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140701031750/http://www.fide.com/fide/handbook.html?id=172&view=article |url-status=live}}</ref> :{| |- style="vertical-align:top;" ! {{mvar|K}}-factor !! Used for players with ratings ... |- style="vertical-align:top;" | <math>\; K = 40 \;</math> || for a player new to the rating list until the completion of events with a total of 30 games, and for all players until their 18th birthday, as long as their rating remains under 2300. |- style="vertical-align:top;" | <math>\; K = 20 \;</math> || for players who have always been rated under 2400. |- style="vertical-align:top;" | <math>\; K = 10 \;</math> || for players with any published rating of at least 2400 and at least 30 games played in previous events. Thereafter it remains permanently at 10. |} FIDE used the following ranges before July 2014:<ref name="FideRulesOld">{{cite report |title=FIDE Rating Regulations valid from 1 July 2013 till 1 July 2014 |date=2013-07-01 |website=FIDE Online (fide.com) |url=http://www.fide.com/fide/handbook.html?id=161&view=article |access-date=2014-07-01 |archive-date=2014-07-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140715002648/http://www.fide.com/fide/handbook.html?id=161&view=article |url-status=live }}</ref> :{| |- ! {{mvar|K}}-factor !! Used for players with ratings ... |- style="vertical-align:top;" | <math>\; K = 30 \;</math><br/>(was 25) || for a player new to the rating list until the completion of events with a total of 30 games.<ref name="Changes to FIDE Rating Regulations">{{cite press release |title=Changes to Rating Regulations |website=FIDE Online (fide.com) |publisher=[[FIDE]] |date=2011-07-21 |url=http://www.fide.com/component/content/article/1-fide-news/5421-changes-to-rating-regulations.html |access-date=2012-02-19 |archive-date=2012-05-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120513170023/http://www.fide.com/component/content/article/1-fide-news/5421-changes-to-rating-regulations.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> |- style="vertical-align:top;" | <math>\; K = 15 \;</math> || for players who have always been rated under 2400. |- style="vertical-align:top;" | <math>\; K = 10 \;</math> || for players with any published rating of at least 2400 and at least 30 games played in previous events. Thereafter it remains permanently at 10. |} <!-- I find the remainder of this section incomprehensible. Help!! --> <!-- I think -- but am not certain -- that it is saying a high K-factor helps high rated players exploit other flaws in the rating system in situations where they can choose their opponents. --> The gradation of the {{mvar|K}}-factor reduces rating change at the top end of the rating range, reducing the possibility for rapid rise or fall of rating for those with a rating high enough to reach a low {{mvar|K}}-factor. In theory, this might apply equally to online chess players and over-the-board players, since it is more difficult for all players to raise their rating after their rating has become high and their {{mvar|K}}-factor consequently reduced. However, when playing online, 2800+ players can more easily raise their rating by simply selecting opponents with high ratings β on the ICC playing site, a [[grandmaster (chess)|grandmaster]] may play a string of different opponents who are all rated over 2700.<ref>{{cite web |title=''K''-factor |series=ICC Help |website=Chessclub.com |date=2002-10-18 |url=http://www.chessclub.com/help/k-factor |access-date=2012-02-19 |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120313023307/http://www.chessclub.com/help/k-factor |archive-date=2012-03-13 }}</ref> In over-the-board events, it would only be in very high level all-play-all events that a player would be able to engage that number of 2700+ opponents. In a normal, open, Swiss-paired chess tournament, frequently there would be many opponents rated less than 2500, reducing the ratings gains possible from a single contest for a high-rated player.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Elo rating system
(section)
Add topic