Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Asteroid impact avoidance
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====Surface and subsurface use==== [[File:Asteroid Capture.jpg|thumb|This early [[Asteroid Redirect Mission]] artist's impression is suggestive of another method of changing a large threatening celestial body's orbit by [[asteroid capture|capturing]] relatively smaller celestial objects and using those, and not the usually proposed small bits of spacecraft, as the means of creating a powerful [[kinetic energy|kinetic impact]],<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Asphaug|first1=E.|last2=Ostro|first2=S. J.|last3=Hudson|first3=R. S.|last4=Scheeres|first4=D. J.|last5=Benz|first5=W.|date=1998|title=Disruption of kilometre-sized asteroids by energetic collisions|journal=Nature|volume=393|issue=6684|pages=437β440|url=http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/19541/1/98-0965.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306071546/http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/19541/1/98-0965.pdf|archive-date=March 6, 2016|doi=10.1038/30911|bibcode=1998Natur.393..437A|s2cid=4328861}}</ref> or alternatively, a stronger faster acting [[gravitational tractor]], as some low-density asteroids such as [[253 Mathilde]] can [[crumple zone|dissipate impact energy]].]] In 2011, the director of the Asteroid Deflection Research Center at [[Iowa State University]], Dr. Bong Wie (who had published kinetic impactor deflection studies<ref name="spacesailing.net"/> previously), began to study strategies that could deal with {{convert|50|to(-)|500|m|ft|adj=mid|-diameter|-2|sp=us}} objects when the time to Earth impact was less than one year. He concluded that to provide the required energy, a nuclear explosion or other event that could deliver the same power, are the only methods that can work against a very large asteroid within these time constraints. This work resulted in the creation of a conceptual [[Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle]] (HAIV), which combines a [[Deep Impact (spacecraft)|kinetic impactor]] to create an initial [[Impact crater|crater]] for a follow-up subsurface nuclear detonation within that initial crater, which would generate a high degree of efficiency in the conversion of the nuclear energy that is released in the detonation into propulsion energy to the asteroid.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.space.com/21333-asteroid-nuke-spacecraft-mission.html |title=Nuking Dangerous Asteroids Might be the Best Protection, Expert Says |website=[[Space.com]] |date=29 May 2013 |access-date=2013-07-02 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160401213420/http://www.space.com/21333-asteroid-nuke-spacecraft-mission.html |archive-date=2016-04-01 }} Nuking Dangerous Asteroids Might Be the Best Protection, Expert Says. Includes a supercomputer simulation video provided by [[Los Alamos National Laboratory]].</ref> A similar proposal would use a surface-detonating nuclear device in place of the kinetic impactor to create the initial crater, then using the crater as a [[rocket nozzle]] to channel succeeding nuclear detonations. Wie claimed the computer models he worked on showed the possibility for a {{convert|300|m|ft|adj=mid|-wide|abbr=off|sp=us}} asteroid to be destroyed using a single HAIV with a warning time of 30 days. Additionally, the models showed that less than 0.1% of debris from the asteroid would reach Earth's surface.<ref>{{Cite web |author1=Mike Wall |date=2014-02-14 |title=How Nuclear Bombs Could Save Earth from Killer Asteroids |url=https://www.space.com/24696-asteroid-strike-nuclear-bombs.html |access-date=2023-04-25 |website=Space.com |language=en}}</ref> There have been few substantial updates from Wie and his team since 2014 regarding the research. As of 2015, Wie has collaborated with the Danish [[Emergency Asteroid Defence Project]] (EADP), which intends to [[crowdsource]] sufficient funds to design, build, and store a non-nuclear HAIV spacecraft as planetary insurance. For threatening asteroids too large or close to Earth impact to effectively be deflected by the non-nuclear HAIV approach, nuclear explosive devices (with 5% of the explosive yield than those used for the stand-off strategy) are intended to be used, under international oversight, when conditions arise that necessitate it.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://asteroiddefence.com/|title=EADP|date=May 5, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150505181554/http://asteroiddefence.com/ |archive-date=2015-05-05 }}</ref> A study published in 2020 pointed out that a non-nuclear kinetic impact becomes less effective the larger and closer the asteroid. However, researchers ran a model that suggested a nuclear detonation near the surface of an asteroid designed to cover one side of the asteroid with x-rays would be effective. When the x-rays cover one side of an asteroid in the program, the energy would propel the asteroid in a preferred direction.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Dearborn |first1=David S. P. |last2=Bruck Syal |first2=Megan |last3=Barbee |first3=Brent W. |last4=Gisler |first4=Galen |last5=Greenaugh |first5=Kevin |last6=Howley |first6=Kirsten M. |last7=Leung |first7=Ronald |last8=Lyzhoft |first8=Joshua |last9=Miller |first9=Paul L. |last10=Nuth |first10=Joseph A. |last11=Plesko |first11=Catherine S. |last12=Seery |first12=Bernard D. |last13=Wasem |first13=Joseph V. |last14=Weaver |first14=Robert P. |last15=Zebenay |first15=Melak |date=2020-01-01 |title=Options and uncertainties in planetary defense: Impulse-dependent response and the physical properties of asteroids |journal=Acta Astronautica |language=en |volume=166 |pages=290β305 |doi=10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.10.026 |bibcode=2020AcAau.166..290D |s2cid=208840044 |issn=0094-5765|doi-access=free }}</ref> The lead researcher with the study, Dave Dearborn, said a nuclear impact offered more flexibility than a non-nuclear approach, as the energy output can be adjusted specifically to the asteroid's size and location.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Nuclear impulse could deflect massive asteroid |url=https://www.llnl.gov/news/nuclear-impulse-could-deflect-massive-asteroid |access-date=2023-04-25 |website=Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |language=en}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Asteroid impact avoidance
(section)
Add topic