Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Roger Ebert
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Contrarian reviews=== [[Metacritic]] later noted that Ebert tended to give more lenient ratings than most critics. His average film rating was 71%, if translated into a percentage, compared to 59% for the site as a whole. Of his reviews, 75% were positive and 75% of his ratings were better than his colleagues.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.metacritic.com/feature/remembering-roger-ebert |website=[[Metacritic]] |title=Remembering Roger Ebert: His reviews |access-date=October 20, 2017 |archive-date=November 23, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171123140724/http://www.metacritic.com/feature/remembering-roger-ebert |url-status=dead }}</ref> Ebert had acknowledged in 2008 that he gave higher ratings on average than other critics, though he said this was in part because he considered a rating of 3 out of 4 stars to be the general threshold for a film to get a "thumbs up."<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/you-give-out-too-many-stars |title=You give out too many stars |first=Roger |last=Ebert |website=www.rogerebert.com/ |date=December 14, 2012 |access-date=July 15, 2021 |archive-date=August 16, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816125632/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/you-give-out-too-many-stars |url-status=live }}</ref> Writing in ''[[Random House of Canada|Hazlitt]]'' about Ebert's reviews, Will Sloan argued that "[t]here were inevitably movies where he veered from consensus, but he was not provocative or idiosyncratic by nature."<ref name="sloan-hazlitt">{{cite web |url=https://hazlitt.net/feature/roger-eberts-zero-star-movies |title=Roger Ebert's Zero-Star Movies |website=[[Random House of Canada|Hazlitt]] |last=Sloan |first=Will |date=February 21, 2017 |access-date=March 10, 2019 |archive-date=September 4, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180904192043/https://hazlitt.net/feature/roger-eberts-zero-star-movies |url-status=live }}</ref> Examples of Ebert dissenting from other critics include his negative reviews of such celebrated films as [[Blue Velvet (film)|''Blue Velvet'']] ("marred by sophomoric satire and cheap shots"),<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=Blue Velvet |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/blue-velvet-1986 |newspaper=[[Chicago Sun-Times]] |access-date=January 2, 2021 |date=September 19, 1986 |via=[[RogerEbert.com]] |archive-date=April 27, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210427124003/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/blue-velvet-1986 |url-status=live }}</ref> ''[[A Clockwork Orange (film)|A Clockwork Orange]]'' ("a paranoid right-wing fantasy masquerading as an [[Orwellian]] warning"),<ref>{{cite news |first=Roger |last=Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/a-clockwork-orange-1972 |title=A Clockwork Orange |newspaper=[[Chicago Sun-Times]] |date=February 2, 1972 |access-date=April 23, 2022 |archive-date=July 1, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190701195957/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/a-clockwork-orange-1972 |url-status=live }}</ref> and ''[[The Usual Suspects]]'' ("To the degree that I do understand, I don't care").<ref>{{cite news |first=Roger |last=Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-usual-suspects-1995 |title=The Usual Suspects |newspaper=[[The Chicago Sun-Times]] |date=August 18, 1995 |access-date=April 23, 2022 |archive-date=April 26, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200426171724/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-usual-suspects-1995 |url-status=live }}</ref> He gave only two out of four stars to the widely acclaimed ''[[Brazil (1985 film)|Brazil]]'', calling it "very hard to follow"<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/brazil-1986 | title=Brazil movie review & film summary (1986) | Roger Ebert | access-date=July 28, 2023 | archive-date=February 13, 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210213230759/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/brazil-1986 | url-status=live }}</ref> and is the only critic on [[RottenTomatoes]] to not like it.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1003033-brazil | title=Brazil - Rotten Tomatoes | website=[[Rotten Tomatoes]] | access-date=July 28, 2023 | archive-date=November 7, 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231107110259/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1003033-brazil | url-status=live }}</ref> He gave a one-star review to the critically acclaimed [[Abbas Kiarostami]] film ''[[Taste of Cherry]]'', which won the ''[[Palme d'Or]]'' at the [[1997 Cannes Film Festival]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=Taste of Cherry |newspaper=[[Chicago Sun-Times]] |date=February 27, 1998 |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/taste-of-cherry-1998 |access-date=July 31, 2017 |via=[[RogerEbert.com]] |archive-date=April 27, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210427124019/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/taste-of-cherry-1998 |url-status=live }}</ref> Ebert later added the film to a list of his most-hated movies of all time.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/eberts-most-hated |work=[[RogerEbert.com]] |title=Ebert's Most Hated |access-date=July 31, 2017 |archive-date=August 2, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130802044414/http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/eberts-most-hated |url-status=live }}</ref> He was dismissive of the 1988 [[Bruce Willis]] action film ''[[Die Hard]]'', stating that "inappropriate and wrongheaded interruptions reveal the fragile nature of the plot".<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=Die Hard |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19880715/REVIEWS/807150301/1023 |access-date=September 4, 2009 |work=[[Chicago Sun-Times]] |date=July 15, 1988 |archive-date=March 2, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110302012747/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19880715/REVIEWS/807150301/1023 |url-status=dead |via=[[RogerEbert.com]]}}</ref> His positive 3 out of 4 stars review of 1997's ''[[Speed 2: Cruise Control]]'', "Movies like this embrace goofiness with an almost sensual pleasure"<ref>{{cite web |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title=Speed 2: Cruise Control movie review (1997) {{!}} Roger Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/speed-2-cruise-control-1997 |website=[[RogerEbert.com]] |access-date=February 14, 2023 |language=en |archive-date=July 23, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130723055317/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/speed-2-cruise-control-1997 |url-status=live }}</ref> is one of only three positive reviews accounting for that film's 4% approval rating on the reviewer aggregator website [[Rotten Tomatoes]], one of the two others having been written by his ''At the Movies'' co-star Gene Siskel.<ref>{{cite web |title=Speed 2 - Cruise Control (1997) |url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/speed_2_cruise_control/ |website=[[Rotten Tomatoes]] |access-date=March 3, 2019 |archive-date=April 30, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190430074753/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/speed_2_cruise_control |url-status=live }}</ref> Ebert reflected on his ''Speed 2'' review in 2013, and wrote that it was "Frequently cited as an example of what a lousy critic I am," but defended his opinion, and noted, "I'm grateful to movies that show me what I haven't seen before, and ''Speed 2'' had a cruise ship plowing right up the main street of a Caribbean village."<ref name="speed3">{{cite web |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title="Speed 3"--Winner of my 1999 contest {{!}} Roger Ebert {{!}} Roger Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/speed-3-winner-of-my-1999-contest |website=[[RogerEbert.com]] |date=February 11, 2013 |access-date=February 14, 2023 |language=en |archive-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230214211237/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/speed-3-winner-of-my-1999-contest |url-status=live }}</ref> In 1999, Ebert held a contest for [[University of Colorado Boulder]] students to create short films with a ''Speed 3'' theme about an object that could not stop moving.<ref name="speed3"/> The winning entrant was set on a roller coaster and was screened at Ebertfest that year.<ref name="speed3"/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Roger Ebert
(section)
Add topic