Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Progressive rock
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=====Commercialisation===== {{quote box |align=right |quote=By the early 1980s, progressive rock was thought to be all but dead as a style, an idea reinforced by the fact that some of the principal progressive groups had developed a more commercial sound. ... What went out of the music of these now ex-progressive groups ... was any significant evocation of art music. |source=β John Covach{{sfn|Covach|1997|p=5}} |width=25% }} Some established artists moved towards music that was simpler and more commercially viable.{{sfn|Hegarty|Halliwell|2011|p=182}}{{verify source|date=June 2016}}{{sfn|Covach|1997|p=5}} Arena rock bands like [[Journey (band)|Journey]], [[Kansas (band)|Kansas]], [[Styx (band)|Styx]], [[GTR (band)|GTR]], [[Electric Light Orchestra|ELO]] and [[Foreigner (band)|Foreigner]] either had begun as progressive rock bands or included members with strong ties to the genre. These groups retained some of the song complexity and orchestral-style arrangements, but they moved away from lyrical mysticism in favour of more conventional themes such as relationships.{{sfn|Hegarty|Halliwell|2011|pp=181β182}} These radio-friendly groups have been called "prog lite".{{sfn|Cateforis|2011|pp=154β159}} Genesis transformed into a successful pop act, the prog supergroup [[Asia (band)|Asia]] (consisting of members of Yes, King Crimson, and ELP) scored a number-one album in 1982,<ref>{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=2 January 2013 |title=Billboard 200 |url=https://www.billboard.com/charts/billboard-200/1982-05-15/ |access-date=16 February 2023 |website=[[Billboard charts|Billboard]] |language=en-US}}</ref> and a re-formed Yes released the relatively mainstream ''[[90125 (album)|90125]]'' (1983), which yielded their only US number-one single, "[[Owner of a Lonely Heart]]". One band who remained successful into the 1980s while maintaining a progressive approach was Pink Floyd, who released ''[[The Wall]]'' late in 1979. The album, which brought punk anger into progressive rock,{{sfn|Hegarty|Halliwell|2011|p=174}} was a huge success and was later filmed as ''[[Pink Floyd β The Wall]]''.{{refn|group=nb|Pink Floyd were unable to repeat that combination of commercial and critical success, as their sole follow-up, ''[[The Final Cut (album)|The Final Cut]]'', was several years in coming{{sfn|Macan|1997|p=188}} and was essentially a [[Roger Waters]] solo project<ref name="merc">{{cite news |author=Anonymous |title=The Mag: Play: The Final Cut (EMI) Pink Floyd. (Features) |newspaper=Sunday Mercury |place=Birmingham, England |date=4 April 2004}}</ref> that consisted largely of material that had been rejected for ''The Wall''.<ref name="tsmith">{{cite news |last=Smith |first=Tierney |title=Whatever Happened to Pink Floyd? The Strange Case of Waters and Gilmour |work=Goldmine |publisher=Krause Publications |date=Apr 2011}}</ref> The band later reunited without Waters and restored many of the progressive elements that had been downplayed in the band's late-1970s work.{{sfn|Macan|1997|p=195}} This version of the band was very popular,<ref name="harrington87">{{cite news |last=Harrington |first=Richard |title=Pink Floyd, By Any Name; Minus a Longtime Leader, The Band Stays the Course |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=19 October 1987}}</ref> but critical opinion of their later albums is less favourable.<ref name="graves">{{cite magazine |last=Graves |first=Tom |title=Pink Floyd: The Division Bell |magazine=Rolling Stone |date=16 June 1994 |access-date=4 July 2013 |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/the-division-bell-19940616 |archive-date=16 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140116065204/http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/the-division-bell-19940616 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="wyman">{{cite web |last=Wyman |first=Bill |title=The four phases of Pink Floyd |work=The Chicago Reader |date=14 January 1988 |access-date=4 July 2013 |url=http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/the-four-phases-of-pink-floyd/Content?oid=871627 |archive-date=12 August 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140812173644/http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/the-four-phases-of-pink-floyd/Content?oid=871627 |url-status=live }}</ref>}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Progressive rock
(section)
Add topic