Editing Mohism (section)

==Modern perspectives==
[[Jin Guantao]], a professor of the Institute of Chinese Studies at the [[Chinese University of Hong Kong]], Fan Hongye, a research fellow with the [[Chinese Academy of Sciences]]' Institute of Science Policy and Managerial Science, and Liu Qingfeng, a professor of the Institute of Chinese Culture at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, have argued that without the influence of proto-scientific precepts in the ancient philosophy of Mohism, Chinese science lacked a definitive structure:<ref name = "jin fan liu 1996 178 179">Jin, Fan, & Liu (1996), 178–179.</ref>

<blockquote>From the middle and late Eastern Han to the early Wei and Jin dynasties, the net growth of ancient Chinese science and technology experienced a peak (second only to that of the Northern Song dynasty)...  Han studies of the Confucian classics, which for a long time had hindered the socialization of science, were declining. If Mohism, rich in scientific thought, had rapidly grown and strengthened, the situation might have been very favorable to the development of a scientific structure. However, this did not happen because the seeds of the primitive structure of science were never formed. During the late [[Eastern Han]], disastrous upheavals again occurred in the process of social transformation, leading to [[Three Kingdoms period|the greatest social disorder in Chinese history]]. One can imagine the effect of this calamity on science.<ref name="jin fan liu 1996 178 179"/></blockquote>