Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Isidore of Seville
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Criticisms and contemporary appraisal == Contemporary researchers have criticised Isidore—specifically, his work in the ''Etymologies.'' The historian Sandro D'Onofrio has argued that "job consisted here and there of restating, recapitulating, and sometimes simply transliterating both data and theories that lacked research and originality."<ref>Sandro D'Onofrio, "Isidore of Seville," in Henrik Legerlund, ed., ''Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy, 500–1500'' (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011), 574. </ref> In this view, Isidore—considering the large popularity his works enjoyed during the Middle Ages and the founding role he had in [[Scholasticism]]—would be less a brilliant thinker than a Christian gatekeeper making etymologies fit into the Christian worldview. "[H]e prescribed what they should mean," asserts D'Onofrio. The researcher Victor Bruno has countered this argument. According to him, it was not the meaning of the ''Etymologies'', or of Isidore's work as a whole, to give a scientific or philological account of the words, as a modern researcher would do. "It is obvious that, from a material point of view," argues Bruno, "Isidore's practical knowledge on etymology, geography, and history are considered outdated; his methods, from the current academic and scientific standpoint, are questionable, and some of his conclusions are indeed incorrect. But Isidore is less concerned about being etymologically or philologically right than being ''ontologically'' right."<ref>Victor Bruno, "St. Isidore of Seville and Traditional Philosophy," ''Sacred Web'' 49 (2022): 99. </ref> Therefore, Isidore, despite living in the [[Early Middle Ages]], is an [[Mircea Eliade|archaic]] or "traditional" thinker. Being religiously inclined, Isidore would be concerned with the redeeming meaning of words and history, the ultimate quest of religions. The same researcher also found parallels between Isidore's interpretation of the word "year" (''annus'') and the meaning of the same words in the ''Jāiminīya-Upaniṣad-Brāmaṇa''.<ref>Bruno, "St. Isidore of Seville and Traditional Philosophy," 101. </ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Isidore of Seville
(section)
Add topic