Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Hex (board game)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Computational complexity=== In 1976, [[Shimon Even]] and [[Robert Tarjan]] proved that determining whether a position in a game of generalized Hex played on arbitrary graphs is a winning position is [[PSPACE-complete]].<ref>{{Cite journal|doi = 10.1145/321978.321989|title = A Combinatorial Problem Which is Complete in Polynomial Space|year = 1976|last1 = Even|first1 = S.|last2 = Tarjan|first2 = R. E.|journal = Journal of the ACM|volume = 23|issue = 4|pages = 710–719|s2cid = 8845949|doi-access = free}}</ref> A strengthening of this result was proved by Reisch by reducing the [[True quantified Boolean formula|quantified Boolean formula problem]] in [[conjunctive normal form]] to Hex.<ref>{{cite journal | author = Stefan Reisch | title = Hex ist PSPACE-vollständig (Hex is PSPACE-complete) | journal = Acta Informatica | issue = 2 | year = 1981 | pages = 167–191 | volume=15 | doi=10.1007/bf00288964| s2cid = 9125259 }}</ref> This result means that there is no efficient (polynomial time in board size) algorithm to solve an arbitrary Hex position unless there is an efficient algorithm for all PSPACE problems, which is widely believed not to be the case.<ref>Sanjeev Arora, Boaz Barak, "Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach". Cambridge University Press, 2009. Section 4.3</ref> However, it doesn't rule out the possibility of a simple winning strategy for the initial position (on boards of arbitrary size), or a simple winning strategy for all positions on a board of a particular size. In 11×11 Hex, the state space complexity is approximately 2.4×10<sup>56</sup>;<ref>{{cite book|last1=Browne|first1=C|title=Hex Strategy|date=2000|publisher=A.K. Peters, Ltd.|location=Natick, MA|isbn=1-56881-117-9|pages=5–6}}</ref> versus 4.6×10<sup>46</sup> for chess.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Tromp |first1=J |title=Number of chess diagrams and positions |url=http://homepages.cwi.nl/~tromp/chess/chess.html |website=John's Chess Playground |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629215923/http://homepages.cwi.nl/~tromp/chess/chess.html |archive-date=29 June 2011}}</ref> The game tree complexity is approximately 10<sup>98</sup><ref>H. J. van den Herik; J. W. H. M. Uiterwijk; J. van Rijswijck (2002). "Games solved: Now and in the future". Artificial Intelligence. 134 (1–2): 277–311. </ref> versus 10<sup>123</sup> for chess.<ref>Victor Allis (1994). ''Searching for Solutions in Games and Artificial Intelligence''. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Limburg, pdf, 6.3.9 Chess pp. 171</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Hex (board game)
(section)
Add topic