Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Creation science
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Historical, philosophical, and sociological criticism=== Historically, the debate of whether creationism is compatible with science can be traced back to 1874, the year science historian [[John William Draper]] published his ''History of the Conflict between Religion and Science''. In it Draper portrayed the entire history of scientific development as a war against religion. This presentation of history was propagated further by followers such as [[Andrew Dickson White]] in his two-volume ''A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom'' (1896). Their conclusions have been disputed.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bede.org.uk/university.htm |last=Hannam |first=James |date=December 8, 2009 |title=Medieval Science, the Church and Universities |website=Bede's Library |publisher=James Hannam |location=Maidstone, England |access-date=2013-09-01}}</ref> In the United States, the principal focus of creation science advocates is on the government-supported public school systems, which are prohibited by the [[Establishment Clause]] from promoting specific religions. Historical communities have argued that [[List of Bible translations by language|Biblical translations]] contain many [[Bible errata|translation errors and errata]], and therefore that the use of biblical literalism in creation science is self-contradictory.{{sfn|Alston|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=YGRKhtWCh2cC&pg=PA23 23]|ps=}}{{sfn|Moore|2002|p=[https://archive.org/details/fromgenesistogen0000moor/page/27 27]|ps=}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Creation science
(section)
Add topic