Editing Charles Babbage (section)

=== Religious views ===
Babbage was raised in the Protestant form of the Christian faith, his family having inculcated in him an orthodox form of worship.<ref>[[s:Passages from the Life of a Philosopher/Chapter II#8|''Passages from the Life of a Philosopher'']] (1864), p. 8.</ref> He explained:

{{blockquote|My excellent mother taught me the usual forms of my daily and nightly prayer; and neither in my father nor my mother was there any mixture of bigotry and intolerance on the one hand, nor on the other of that unbecoming and familiar mode of addressing the Almighty which afterwards so much disgusted me in my youthful years.<ref>{{harvnb|Babbage|1864}}</ref>}}

Rejecting the [[Athanasian Creed]] as a "direct contradiction in terms", in his youth he looked to [[Samuel Clarke]]'s works on religion, of which ''Being and Attributes of God'' (1704) exerted a particularly strong influence on him. Later in life, Babbage concluded that "the true value of the Christian religion rested, not on speculative [theology] ... but ... upon those doctrines of kindness and benevolence which that religion claims and enforces, not merely in favour of man himself but of every creature susceptible of pain or of happiness."<ref>[[s:Passages from the Life of a Philosopher/Chapter XXX#404|''Passages from the Life of a Philosopher'']] (1864), pp. 404–405</ref>

In his autobiography [[s:Passages from the Life of a Philosopher|''Passages from the Life of a Philosopher'']] (1864), Babbage wrote a whole chapter on the topic of religion, where he identified three sources of divine knowledge:<ref>[[s:Passages from the Life of a Philosopher/Chapter XXX#396|''Passages from the Life of a Philosopher'']] (1864), p. 396</ref>
# ''A priori'' or mystical experience
# From Revelation
# From the examination of the works of the Creator
He stated, on the basis of the [[design argument]], that studying the works of nature had been the more appealing evidence, and the one which led him to actively profess the [[existence of God]].<ref>Smithsonian Institution. (1846). [https://archive.org/stream/annualreportofbo1873smit#page/174/mode/2up Annual report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution]. Washington Government Printing Office. Smithsonian Institution</ref><ref>[[s:Passages from the Life of a Philosopher/Chapter XXX#403|''Passages from the Life of a Philosopher'']] (1864), The Athanasian Creed, p. 403: "In the course of my inquiries, I met with the work upon the Trinity, by Dr. Samuel Clarke. This I carefully examined, and although very far from being satisfied, I ceased from further inquiry. This change arose probably from my having acquired the much more valuable work of the same author, on the Being and Attributes of God. This I studied, and felt that its doctrine was much more intelligible and satisfactory than that of the former work. I may now state, as the result of a long life spent in studying the works of the Creator, that I am satisfied they afford far more satisfactory and more convincing proofs of the existence of a supreme Being than any evidence transmitted through human testimony can possibly supply."</ref> Advocating for natural theology, he wrote:
{{blockquote|In the works of the Creator ever open to our examination, we possess a firm basis on which to raise the superstructure of an enlightened creed. The more man inquires into the laws which regulate the material universe, the more he is convinced that all its varied forms arise from the action of a few simple principles ...  The works of the Creator, ever present to our senses, give a living and perpetual testimony of his power and goodness far surpassing any evidence transmitted through human testimony. The testimony of man becomes fainter at every stage of transmission, whilst each new inquiry into the works of the Almighty gives to us more exalted views of his wisdom, his goodness, and his power.<ref>[[s:Passages from the Life of a Philosopher/Chapter XXX#396|''Passages from the Life of a Philosopher'']] (1864), pp. 396–402</ref>}}

Like [[Samuel Vince]], Babbage also wrote a defence of the belief in divine [[miracle]]s.<ref>Pickover, Clifford A. (2009). ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=JrslMKTgSZwC&q=Babbage The Math Book: From Pythagoras to the 57th Dimension, 250 Milestones in the History of Mathematics].'' Sterling Publishing Company, Inc. p. 218</ref> Against objections previously posed by [[David Hume]], Babbage advocated for the belief of divine agency, stating "we must not measure the credibility or incredibility of an event by the narrow sphere of our own experience, nor forget that there is a Divine energy which overrides what we familiarly call the laws of nature."<ref>Babbage, Charles. (1864) [[s:Passages from the Life of a Philosopher/Appendix#488|''Passages from the Life of a Philosopher'']], Appendix: "Miracles", p. 488</ref> He alluded to the limits of human experience, expressing: "all that we see in a miracle is an effect which is new to our observation, and whose cause is concealed. The cause may be beyond the sphere of our observation, and would be thus beyond the familiar sphere of nature; but this does not make the event a violation of any law of nature. The limits of man's observation lie within very narrow boundaries, and it would be arrogance to suppose that the reach of man's power is to form the limits of the natural world."<ref>Babbage, Charles. (1864) [[s:Passages from the Life of a Philosopher/Appendix#488|''Passages from the Life of a Philosopher'']], Appendix: "Miracles", pp. 487–488</ref>