Editing Austronesian languages (section)

==History{{anchor|Homeland}}==
{{Further|Austronesian peoples#Migration from Taiwan{{!}}Austronesian expansion}}

[[File:Chronological dispersal of Austronesian people across the Pacific.svg|thumb|A map of the Austronesian expansion. Periods are based on archeological studies, though the association of the archeological record and linguistic reconstructions is disputed.|center|800x800px]]

From the standpoint of [[historical linguistics]], the place of origin (in linguistic terminology, ''[[Urheimat]]'') of the Austronesian languages ([[Proto-Austronesian language]]) is most likely the [[Taiwan|main island of Taiwan]], also known as Formosa; on this island the deepest divisions in Austronesian are found along small geographic distances, among the families of the native [[Formosan languages]].

According to [[Robert Blust]], the Formosan languages form nine of the ten primary branches of the Austronesian language family.{{sfnp|Sagart|2002}} {{Harvcoltxt|Comrie|2001|p=28}} noted this when he wrote: <blockquote>... the internal diversity among the... Formosan languages... is greater than that in all the rest of Austronesian put together, so there is a major [[genetic relationship (linguistics)|genetic]] split within Austronesian between Formosan and the rest... Indeed, the genetic diversity within Formosan is so great that it may well consist of several primary branches of the overall Austronesian family.</blockquote>At least since {{harvcoltxt|Sapir|1968}}, writing in 1949, linguists have generally accepted that the chronology of the dispersal of languages within a given language family can be traced from the area of greatest linguistic variety to that of the least. For example, English in North America has large numbers of speakers, but relatively low dialectal diversity, while English in Great Britain has much higher diversity; such low linguistic variety by Sapir's thesis suggests a more recent spread of English in North America. While some scholars suspect that the number of principal branches among the Formosan languages may be somewhat less than Blust's estimate of nine (e.g. {{Harvcolnb|Li|2006}}), there is little contention among linguists with this analysis and the resulting view of the origin and direction of the migration. For a recent dissenting analysis, see {{harvcoltxt|Peiros|2004}}.

The [[Austronesian peoples#Prehistory|protohistory of the Austronesian people]] can be traced farther back through time. To get an idea of the original homeland of the populations ancestral to the Austronesian peoples (as opposed to strictly linguistic arguments), evidence from archaeology and [[population genetics]] may be adduced. Studies from the science of genetics have produced conflicting outcomes. Some researchers find evidence for a proto-Austronesian homeland on the Asian mainland (e.g., {{Harvcolnb|Melton et al.|1998}}), while others mirror the linguistic research, rejecting an East Asian origin in favor of Taiwan (e.g., {{Harvcolnb|Trejaut et al.|2005}}). Archaeological evidence (e.g., {{Harvcolnb|Bellwood|1997}}) is more consistent, suggesting that the ancestors of the Austronesians spread from the South Chinese mainland to Taiwan at some time around 8,000 years ago.

Evidence from historical linguistics suggests that it is from this island that seafaring peoples migrated, perhaps in distinct waves separated by millennia, to the entire region encompassed by the Austronesian languages.{{sfnp|Diamond|2000}} It is believed that this migration began around 6,000 years ago.{{sfnp|Blust|1999}} However, evidence from historical linguistics cannot bridge the gap between those two periods. The view that linguistic evidence connects Austronesian languages to the Sino-Tibetan ones, as proposed for example by {{Harvcoltxt|Sagart|2002}}, is a minority one. As {{Harvcoltxt|Fox|2004|p=8}} states:<blockquote>Implied in... discussions of subgrouping [of Austronesian languages] is a broad consensus that the homeland of the Austronesians was in Taiwan. This homeland area may have also included the [[Penghu|P'eng-hu]] (Pescadores) islands between Taiwan and China and possibly even sites on the coast of mainland China, especially if one were to view the early Austronesians as a population of related dialect communities living in scattered coastal settlements.</blockquote>Linguistic analysis of the Proto-Austronesian language stops at the western shores of Taiwan; any related mainland language(s) have not survived. The only exceptions, the [[Chamic languages]], derive from more recent migration to the mainland.{{sfnp|Thurgood|1999|p=225}} However, according to Ostapirat's interpretation of the seriously discussed [[Austro-Tai languages|Austro-Tai]] hypothesis, the [[Kra–Dai languages]] (also known as Tai–Kadai) are exactly those related mainland languages.