Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Axiom of well-ordering (choice) === {{Main|Axiom of choice|Well-ordering theorem|Zorn's lemma}} The last axiom, commonly known as the [[axiom of choice]], is presented here as a property about [[well-order]]s, as in {{harvtxt|Kunen|1980}}. For any set <math>X</math>, there exists a [[binary relation]] <math>R</math> which [[well-order]]s <math>X</math>. This means <math>R</math> is a [[linear order]] on <math>X</math> such that every nonempty [[subset]] of <math>X</math> has a [[least element]] under the order <math>R</math>. <div style="margin-left:1.6em;"><math>\forall X \exists R ( R \;\mbox{well-orders}\; X).</math></div> Given axioms ''1'' – ''8'', many statements are {{not a typo|provably}} equivalent to axiom ''9''. The most common of these goes as follows. Let <math>X</math> be a set whose members are all nonempty. Then there exists a function <math>f</math> from <math>X</math> to the union of the members of <math>X</math>, called a "[[choice function]]", such that for all <math>Y\in X</math> one has <math>f(Y)\in Y</math>. A third version of the axiom, also equivalent, is [[Zorn's lemma]]. Since the existence of a choice function when <math>X</math> is a [[finite set]] is easily proved from axioms ''1–8'', AC only matters for certain [[infinite set]]s. AC is characterized as [[constructive mathematics|nonconstructive]] because it asserts the existence of a choice function but says nothing about how this choice function is to be "constructed".
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory
(section)
Add topic