Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Pelagianism
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Semi-Pelagian controversy=== {{main|Semi-Pelagian controversy}} The resolution of the Pelagian controversy gave rise to a new controversy in southern [[Gaul]] in the fifth and sixth centuries, retrospectively called by the [[misnomer]] "semi-Pelagianism".{{sfn|Weaver|2014|pp=xiv–xv, xviii}}{{sfn|Scheck|2012|p=87}} The "semi-Pelagians" all accepted the condemnation of Pelagius, believed grace was necessary for salvation, and were followers of Augustine.{{sfn|Scheck|2012|p=87}} The controversy centered on differing interpretations of the verse [[1 Timothy 2:4]]:{{sfn|Weaver|2014|p=xviii}} "For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth."<ref>{{bibleref2|1 Timothy|2:3–4|NKJV}}</ref> Augustine and [[Prosper of Aquitaine]] assumed that [[irresistible grace|God's will is always effective]] and that some are not saved (i.e., opposing [[universal reconciliation]]). Their opponents, based on the tradition of Eastern Christianity, argued that [[Augustinian predestination]] contradicted the biblical passage.{{sfn|Scheck|2012|p=87}}{{sfn|Weaver|2014|pp=xv, xix, xxiv}} Cassian, whose writings survived, argued for [[prevenient grace]] that individuals could accept or reject. Other semi-Pelagians were said to undermine the essential role of God's grace in salvation and argue for a median between Augustinianism and Pelagianism, although these alleged writings are no longer extant.{{sfn|Weaver|2014|pp=xviii–xix}} At the [[Council of Orange (529)|Council of Orange]] in 529, called and presided over by the Augustinian [[Caesarius of Arles]], semi-Pelagianism was condemned but Augustinian ideas were also not accepted entirely: the synod advocated [[synergism]], the idea that human freedom and divine grace work together for salvation.{{sfn|Weaver|2014|p=xxiv}}{{sfn|Scheck|2012|p=87}} Christians often used "Pelagianism" as a criticism to imply that the target denied God's grace and strayed into heresy.{{sfn|Rackett|2002|p=236}} Later Augustinians criticized those who asserted a meaningful role for human free will in their own salvation as covert "Pelagians" or "semi-Pelagians".{{sfn|Scheck|2012|p=79}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Pelagianism
(section)
Add topic