Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Mathematical logic
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Other classical logics === Many logics besides first-order logic are studied. These include [[infinitary logics]], which allow for formulas to provide an infinite amount of information, and [[higher-order logic]]s, which include a portion of set theory directly in their semantics. The most well studied infinitary logic is <math>L_{\omega_1,\omega}</math>. In this logic, quantifiers may only be nested to finite depths, as in first-order logic, but formulas may have finite or countably infinite conjunctions and disjunctions within them. Thus, for example, it is possible to say that an object is a whole number using a formula of <math>L_{\omega_1,\omega}</math> such as :<math>(x = 0) \lor (x = 1) \lor (x = 2) \lor \cdots.</math> Higher-order logics allow for quantification not only of elements of the [[domain of discourse]], but subsets of the domain of discourse, sets of such subsets, and other objects of higher type. The semantics are defined so that, rather than having a separate domain for each higher-type quantifier to range over, the quantifiers instead range over all objects of the appropriate type. The logics studied before the development of first-order logic, for example Frege's logic, had similar set-theoretic aspects. Although higher-order logics are more expressive, allowing complete axiomatizations of structures such as the natural numbers, they do not satisfy analogues of the completeness and compactness theorems from first-order logic, and are thus less amenable to proof-theoretic analysis. Another type of logics are '''{{vanchor|fixed-point logic}}s''' that allow [[inductive definition]]s, like one writes for [[primitive recursive function]]s. One can formally define an extension of first-order logic — a notion which encompasses all logics in this section because they behave like first-order logic in certain fundamental ways, but does not encompass all logics in general, e.g. it does not encompass intuitionistic, modal or [[fuzzy logic]]. [[Lindström's theorem]] implies that the only extension of first-order logic satisfying both the [[compactness theorem]] and the [[Löwenheim–Skolem theorem#Downward part|downward Löwenheim–Skolem theorem]] is first-order logic.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Mathematical logic
(section)
Add topic