Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
HIV
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Diagnosis == {{Main|Diagnosis of HIV/AIDS}} [[File:Hiv-timecourse copy.svg|upright=1.35|thumb|right|A generalized graph of the relationship between HIV copies (viral load) and CD4 counts over the average course of untreated HIV infection; any particular individual's disease course may vary considerably. {{legend-line|blue solid 2px|CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell count (cells per µL)}} {{legend-line|red solid 2px|HIV RNA copies per mL of plasma}}]] Many HIV-positive people are unaware that they are infected with the virus.<ref name="Kumaranayake"> {{cite journal | vauthors = Kumaranayake L, Watts C | title = Resource allocation and priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions: addressing the generalized epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa | journal = Journal of International Development | year = 2001 | pages = 451–466 | volume = 13 | issue = 4 | doi = 10.1002/jid.797}}</ref> For example, in 2001 less than 1% of the sexually active urban population in Africa had been tested, and this proportion is even lower in rural populations.<ref name="Kumaranayake" /> Furthermore, in 2001 only 0.5% of [[Pregnancy|pregnant women]] attending urban health facilities were counselled, tested or received their test results.<ref name="Kumaranayake" /> Again, this proportion is even lower in rural health facilities.<ref name="Kumaranayake" /> Since donors may therefore be unaware of their infection, [[Blood donation|donor blood]] and blood products used in medicine and [[medical research]] are routinely screened for HIV.<ref name="Kleinman">{{cite web | author=Kleinman S | publisher=Uptodate | date=September 2004 | url=http://www.uptodate.com/patients/content/topic.do?topicKey=blod_dis/2419 | title=Patient information: Blood donation and transfusion | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080412115832/http://www.uptodate.com/patients/content/topic.do?topicKey=blod_dis%2F2419 | archive-date=April 12, 2008 | url-status=dead | df=mdy-all }}</ref> HIV-1 testing is initially done using an [[enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay]] (ELISA) to detect antibodies to HIV-1. Specimens with a non-reactive result from the initial ELISA are considered HIV-negative, unless new exposure to an infected partner or partner of unknown HIV status has occurred. Specimens with a reactive ELISA result are retested in duplicate.<ref name="CDC2001">{{cite journal |author=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | title = Revised guidelines for HIV counseling, testing, and referral | journal = MMWR Recommendations and Reports | volume = 50 | issue = RR–19 | pages = 1–57 | year = 2001 | pmid = 11718472 }}</ref> If the result of either duplicate test is reactive, the specimen is reported as repeatedly reactive and undergoes confirmatory testing with a more specific supplemental test (e.g., a [[polymerase chain reaction]] (PCR), [[western blot]] or, less commonly, an [[immunofluorescence assay]] (IFA)). Only specimens that are repeatedly reactive by ELISA and positive by IFA or PCR or reactive by western blot are considered HIV-positive and indicative of HIV infection. Specimens that are repeatedly ELISA-reactive occasionally provide an indeterminate western blot result, which may be either an incomplete antibody response to HIV in an infected person or nonspecific reactions in an uninfected person.<ref name="celum">{{cite journal | vauthors = Celum CL, Coombs RW, Lafferty W, Inui TS, Louie PH, Gates CA, McCreedy BJ, Egan R, Grove T, Alexander S | title = Indeterminate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 western blots: seroconversion risk, specificity of supplemental tests, and an algorithm for evaluation | journal = The Journal of Infectious Diseases | volume = 164 | issue = 4 | pages = 656–664 | year = 1991 | pmid = 1894929 | doi = 10.1093/infdis/164.4.656 }}</ref> {{Pie chart | caption= HIV deaths in 2014 excluding the U.S.:<ref>{{cite web |title=Country Comparison :: HIV/AIDS - Deaths |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2157rank.html |publisher=The World Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency |access-date=November 22, 2015 |archive-date=April 30, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170430003645/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2157rank.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> | other = yes | color = cyan | label1 = [[Nigeria]] | value1 = 15.76 | color1 = silver | label2 = [[South Africa]] | value2 = 12.51 | color2 = #FF0000 | label3 = [[India]] | value3 = 11.50 | color3 = #800080 | label4 = [[Tanzania]] | value4 = 4.169 | color4 = #008000 | label5 = [[Mozambique]] | value5 = 4.061 | color5 = #00058f | label6 = [[Zimbabwe]] | value6 = 3.49 | color6 = #808000 | label7 = [[Cameroon]] | value7 = 3.09 | color7 = #7953c1 | label8= [[Indonesia]] | value8 = 3.04 | color8 = #FFA500 | label9= [[Kenya]] | value9 = 2.98 | color9 = #704045 | label10= [[Uganda]] | value10 = 2.97 | color10 = #536cb6 | label11 = [[Malawi]] | value11 = 2.94 | color11 = #5d2e68 | label12 = [[Democratic Republic of the Congo|DR Congo]] | value12 = 2.17 | color12 = #add2d5 | label13 = [[Ethiopia]] | value13 = 2.11 | color13 = #033e88 }} Although IFA can be used to confirm infection in these ambiguous cases, this assay is not widely used. In general, a second specimen should be collected more than a month later and retested for persons with indeterminate western blot results. Although much less commonly available, [[nucleic acid test]]ing (e.g., viral RNA or proviral DNA amplification method) can also help diagnosis in certain situations.<ref name="CDC2001" /> In addition, a few tested specimens might provide inconclusive results because of a low quantity specimen. In these situations, a second specimen is collected and tested for HIV infection. Modern HIV testing is extremely accurate, when the [[window period]] is taken into consideration. A single screening test is correct more than 99% of the time.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Chou R, Selph S, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Zakher B, Blazina I, Korthuis PT | title = Screening for HIV: systematic review to update the 2005 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation |s2cid-access=free |doi-access=free | journal = Annals of Internal Medicine | volume = 157 | issue = 10 | pages = 706–18 | date = November 2012 | pmid = 23165662 | doi = 10.7326/0003-4819-157-10-201211200-00007 | s2cid = 27494096 }}</ref> The chance of a false-positive result in a standard two-step testing protocol is estimated to be about 1 in 250,000 in a low risk population.<ref name="ScreenReview2005">{{cite journal | vauthors = Chou R, Huffman LH, Fu R, Smits AK, Korthuis PT | title = Screening for HIV: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force |s2cid-access=free |doi-access=free | journal = Annals of Internal Medicine | volume = 143 | issue = 1 | pages = 55–73 | date = July 2005 | pmid = 15998755 | doi = 10.7326/0003-4819-143-1-200507050-00010 | author6 = US Preventive Services Task Force | s2cid = 24086322 }}</ref> Testing post-exposure is recommended immediately and then at six weeks, three months, and six months.<ref name="PEP10">{{cite journal | vauthors = Tolle MA, Schwarzwald HL | title = Postexposure prophylaxis against human immunodeficiency virus |url=https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2010/0715/p161.html | journal = American Family Physician | volume = 82 | issue = 2 | pages = 161–6 | date = July 2010 | pmid = 20642270 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231128140702/https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2010/0715/p161.html |archive-date= Nov 28, 2023 }}</ref> The latest recommendations of the US [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)|Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] (CDC) show that HIV testing must start with an [[immunoassay]] combination test for HIV-1 and HIV-2 [[Antibody|antibodies]] and p24 [[antigen]]. A negative result rules out HIV exposure, while a positive one must be followed by an HIV-1/2 antibody differentiation immunoassay to detect which antibodies are present. This gives rise to four possible scenarios: * 1. HIV-1 (+) & HIV-2 (−): HIV-1 antibodies detected * 2. HIV-1 (−) & HIV-2 (+): HIV-2 antibodies detected * 3. HIV-1 (+) & HIV-2 (+): both HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies detected * 4. HIV-1 (−) or indeterminate & HIV-2 (−): [[Nucleic acid test]] must be carried out to detect the acute infection of HIV-1 or its absence.<ref name="cdc.gov">{{cite web|title=Quick Reference Guide—Laboratory Testing for the Diagnosis of HIV Infection: Updated Recommendations|url=https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/testingHIValgorithmQuickRef.pdf|website=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |publisher=New York State Department of Health|access-date=April 13, 2017|pages=1–2|date=June 27, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170302175531/https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/testingHIValgorithmQuickRef.pdf|archive-date=March 2, 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
HIV
(section)
Add topic