Editing Gideon v. Wainwright (section)

==Further reading==
*{{cite journal |year=2000 |title=''Gideon''{{'s}} Promise Unfulfilled: The Need for Litigated Reform of Indigent Defense |journal=[[Harvard Law Review]] |volume=113 |issue=8 |pages=2062–2079 |doi=10.2307/1342319|jstor= 1342319 }}
* {{cite journal|last=Green|first=Bruce|title=Gideon's Amici: Why Do Prosecutors So Rarely Defend the Rights of the Accused?|url=http://www.yalelawjournal.org/essay/gideons-amici-why-do-prosecutors-so-rarely-defend-the-rights-of-the-accused|journal=Yale Law Journal|volume=122|issue=8|pages=2336–2357|date=June 2013}}  The article describes how 23 state attorneys-general, led by [[Walter F. Mondale]] of Minnesota and [[Edward J. McCormack, Jr.]] of Massachusetts, when asked by Florida to participate as [[Amicus curiae|amici curiae]], surprised the Florida Attorney General by submitting a "friend of the court" brief to the Supreme Court on the side of the accused, and advocating for the right to counsel of criminal defendants to defense counsel at the expense of the state.
*{{cite journal |last=Uelmen |first=Gerald F. |year=1995 |title=2001: A Train Ride: A Guided Tour of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel |journal=Law and Contemporary Problems |volume=58 |issue=1 |pages=13–29 |doi=10.2307/1192165|jstor= 1192165 |url=https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs/393 }}
*{{cite journal |last=Van Alstyne |first=William W. |year=1965 |title=In ''Gideon''{{'s}} Wake: Harsher Penalties and the 'Successful' Criminal Appellant |journal=[[Yale Law Journal]] |volume=74 |issue=4 |pages=606–639 |doi=10.2307/794613|jstor= 794613 |s2cid=153464168 |url=https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj/vol74/iss4/4 }}