Editing Euthanasia (section)

===Beginnings of the contemporary euthanasia debate===
In the mid-1800s, the use of [[morphine]] to treat "the pains of death" emerged, with [[John Collins Warren (surgeon, born 1778)|John Warren]] recommending its use in 1848. A similar use of [[chloroform]] was revealed by Joseph Bullar in 1866. However, in neither case was it recommended that the use should be to hasten death. In 1870 Samuel Williams, a schoolteacher, initiated the contemporary euthanasia debate through a speech given at the Birmingham Speculative Club in England, which was subsequently published in a one-off publication entitled ''Essays of the Birmingham Speculative Club'', the collected works of a number of members of an amateur philosophical society.<ref name="Emanuel1994"/>{{rp|794}} Williams' proposal was to use chloroform to deliberately hasten the death of terminally ill patients:

{{blockquote|That in all cases of hopeless and painful illness, it should be the recognized duty of the medical attendant, whenever so desired by the patient, to administer chloroform or such other anaesthetic as may by-and-bye supersede chloroform – so as to destroy consciousness at once, and put the sufferer to a quick and painless death; all needful precautions being adopted to prevent any possible abuse of such duty; and means being taken to establish, beyond the possibility of doubt or question, that the remedy was applied at the express wish of the patient.|Samuel Williams (1872) | ''Euthanasia'' Williams and Northgate: London.<ref name="Emanuel1994"/>{{rp|794}} }}

The essay was favourably reviewed in ''[[Saturday Review (London)|The Saturday Review]]'', but an editorial against the essay appeared in ''[[The Spectator]]''.<ref name="Kemp">{{Cite book |publisher = Manchester University Press |isbn = 978-0-7190-6124-0 |title = Merciful Release |author = Nick Kemp |date = 7 September 2002 |id = 0719061245|ol = 10531689M }}</ref> From there it proved to be influential, and other writers came out in support of such views: Lionel Tollemache wrote in favour of euthanasia, as did [[Annie Besant]], the essayist and reformer who later became involved with the [[National Secular Society]], considering it a duty to society to "die voluntarily and painlessly" when one reaches the point of becoming a 'burden'.<ref name="Kemp" /><ref name="Dowbiggin2007">{{cite book|author=Ian Dowbiggin|title=A Concise History of Euthanasia: Life, Death, God, and Medicine|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CNigO7gMGkUC&pg=PA62|date=March 2007|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|isbn=978-0-7425-3111-6|pages=51, 62–64}}</ref> ''Popular Science'' analyzed the issue in May 1873, assessing both sides of the argument.<ref>{{Cite journal | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=-B8DAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA90 | title = Popular Science | last1 = Corporation | first1 = Bonnier | date = May 1873}}</ref> Kemp notes that at the time, medical doctors did not participate in the discussion; it was "essentially a philosophical enterprise&nbsp;... tied inextricably to a number of objections to the Christian doctrine of the sanctity of human life".<ref name="Kemp" />