Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Chess
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Gameplay== ===Theory=== {{Main|Chess theory|Chess libraries|List of chess books|List of chess periodicals}} Chess has an extensive literature. In 1913, the chess historian [[H.J.R. Murray]] estimated the total number of books, magazines, and [[chess columns in newspapers]] to be about 5,000.<ref>{{harvp|Murray|1985|p=25}}</ref> [[Baruch Harold Wood|B.H. Wood]] estimated the number, as of 1949, to be about 20,000.<ref name="harvp|Hooper|Whyld|1992|p=229">{{harvp|Hooper|Whyld|1992|p=229}}</ref> [[David Hooper (chess player)|David Hooper]] and [[Kenneth Whyld]] write that, "Since then there has been a steady increase year by year of the number of new chess publications. No one knows how many have been printed."<ref name="harvp|Hooper|Whyld|1992|p=229"/> Significant public chess libraries include the John G. White Chess and Checkers Collection at [[Cleveland Public Library]], with over 32,000 chess books and over 6,000 bound volumes of chess periodicals;<ref name="PolgarRecords">{{Cite web|date=2008-02-11|title= Special Chess Records|url=https://chessdailynews.com/special-chess-records/|access-date=2022-12-29|website=Chess Daily News |author= Susan Polgar| author-link= Susan Polgar |language=en-US|archive-date=29 December 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221229064443/https://chessdailynews.com/special-chess-records/|url-status=live}}</ref> and the Chess & Draughts collection at the [[National Library of the Netherlands]], with about 30,000 books.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.kb.nl/en/resources-research-guides/kb-collections/collections-by-theme/chess-and-draughts-collection |title=Chess and draughts collection β Koninklijke Bibliotheek |work=kb.nl |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150602095256/http://www.kb.nl/en/resources-research-guides/kb-collections/collections-by-theme/chess-and-draughts-collection |archive-date=2 June 2015}}</ref> ===Strategy=== {{Main|Chess strategy}} {| style="float:right;" |- valign="top" |+ Example of underlying pawn structure | {{col-begin|width=auto; float:right; clear:right}} {{col-break}} {{Chess diagram small | tright | |rd| |bd| |rd| |kd| |pd|pd| |nd| |pd|bd|pd | | |pd|rl| |nd|pd| | | | | |pd| | | | | |pl| |pl| | | | | |nl| |bl|nl| |pl |pl|pl| | | |pl|pl| | | |kl| | |bl| |rl |Position after 12...Re8 ...<br /><small>Tarrasch vs. Euwe, Bad Pistyan (1922)</small><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1006866 |title=Siegbert Tarrasch vs. Max Euwe, Bad Pistyan it, CZE 1922 |website=[[Chessgames.com]] |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090110122502/http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1006866 |archive-date=10 January 2009}}</ref> }} {{col-break}} {{Chess diagram small | tright | | | | | | | | | |pd|pd| | | |pd| |pd | | |pd| | | |pd| | | | | |pd| | | | | |pl| |pl| | | | | | | | | | |pl |pl|pl| | | |pl|pl| | | | | | | | | | ... and its pawn structure, known as the Rauzer formation }} {{col-end}} |} Chess strategy is concerned with the evaluation of chess positions and with setting up goals and long-term plans for future play. During the evaluation, players must take into account numerous factors such as the value of the pieces on the board, control of the center and centralization, the [[pawn structure]], king safety, and the control of [[key square]]s or groups of squares (for example, diagonals, open files, and dark or light squares). The most basic step in evaluating a position is to count the [[Chess piece relative value|total value of pieces]] of both sides.<ref>{{harvp|Harding|2003|pp=1β7}}</ref> The point values used for this purpose are based on experience; usually, pawns are considered worth one point, knights and bishops about three points each, rooks about five points (the value difference between a rook and a bishop or knight being known as [[The exchange (chess)|the exchange]]), and queens about nine points. The king is more valuable than all of the other pieces combined, since its checkmate loses the game, but is still capable as a fighting piece; in the endgame, the king is generally more powerful than a bishop or knight but less powerful than a rook.<ref>{{harvp|Lasker|1934|p=73}}</ref> These basic values are then modified by other factors like position of the piece (e.g. advanced pawns are usually more valuable than those on their initial squares), coordination between pieces (e.g. a pair of bishops usually coordinate better than a bishop and a knight), or the type of position (e.g. knights are generally better in {{chessgloss|closed game|closed positions}} with many pawns while bishops are more powerful in {{chessgloss|open game|open positions}}).<ref>{{harvp|Watson|1998|pp=163ff}}</ref> Another important factor in the evaluation of chess positions is ''[[pawn structure]]'' (sometimes known as the ''pawn skeleton''): the configuration of pawns on the chessboard.<ref>{{harvp|Harding|2003|pp=138ff}}</ref> Since pawns are the least mobile of the pieces, pawn structure is relatively static and largely determines the strategic nature of the position. Weaknesses in pawn structure include [[Isolated pawn|isolated]], [[Doubled pawns|doubled]], or [[backward pawn]]s and {{chessgloss|holes}}; once created, they are often permanent. Care must therefore be taken to avoid these weaknesses unless they are compensated by another valuable asset (for example, by the possibility of developing an attack).<ref>{{harvp|Evans|1958|pp=22β67}}</ref> {{clear left}} ===Tactics=== {{Main|Chess tactics}} In chess, tactics generally refer to short-term maneuvers β so short-term that they can be calculated in advance by a human player. The possible depth of calculation depends on the player's ability. In {{chessgloss|quiet move|quiet}} positions with many possibilities on both sides, a deep calculation is more difficult and may not be practical, while in positions with a limited number of {{chessgloss|forced move|forced}} variations, strong players can calculate long sequences of moves. Theoreticians describe many elementary tactical methods and typical maneuvers, for example: [[Pin (chess)|pins]], [[Fork (chess)|forks]], [[Skewer (chess)|skewers]], [[Battery (chess)|batteries]], [[discovered attack]]s (especially discovered checks), [[zwischenzug]]s, [[Deflection (chess)|deflections]], [[Decoy (chess)|decoys]], [[Sacrifice (chess)|sacrifices]], [[Undermining (chess)|underminings]], [[Overloading (chess)|overloadings]], and [[Interference (chess)|interferences]].<ref>{{harvp|Harding|2003|pp=8ff}}</ref> Simple one-move or two-move tactical actions β threats, exchanges of {{chessgloss|material}}, and double attacks β can be combined into longer sequences of tactical maneuvers that are often forced from the point of view of one or both players. A forced variation that involves a sacrifice and usually results in a tangible gain is called a ''[[Combination (chess)|combination]]''.<ref>{{harvp|Harding|2003|pp=70ff}}</ref> Brilliant combinations β such as those in the [[Immortal Game]] β are considered beautiful and are admired by chess lovers. A [[Chess puzzle#Tactical puzzles|common type of chess exercise]], aimed at developing players' tactical skills, is a position where a combination is available and the challenge is to find it. Such positions are usually taken from actual games or from analysis of actual games. Solutions usually result in checkmate, decisive advantage, or successful defense. Tactical exercises are commonly found in instructional books, chess magazines, newspaper chess columns, and internet chess sites.<ref>{{harvp|Burgess|Nunn|Emms|2004|pp=14β15}}</ref> ===Phases=== Chess theory divides chess games into three phases with different sets of strategies: the [[#Opening|opening]], the [[#Middlegame|middlegame]], and lastly the [[#Endgame|endgame]]. There is no universally accepted way to delineate the three phases of the game; the middlegame is typically considered to have begun after 10β20 moves, and the endgame when only a few pieces remain. ====Opening==== {{Main|Chess opening}} {{Chess diagram |tright | |rd|nd|bd|qd|kd|bd| |rd | |pd| | |pd|pd|pd|pd |pd| | |pd| |nd| | | | | | | | | | | | | |nl|pl| | | | | |nl| | | | | |pl|pl|pl| | |pl|pl|pl |rl| |bl|ql|kl|bl| |rl |The [[Sicilian Defense, Najdorf Variation|Najdorf Variation]] (5...a6), a popular line of the [[Sicilian Defense]] (1...c5), itself a response to the [[King's Pawn Game]] (1.e4) }} Competitive players typically learn, memorize, and play well-documented sequences of opening moves. The most common starting moves for White are '''1.e4''' and '''1.d4''', which usually lead to substantially different types of positions, and Black has multiple viable responses to both. Sequences of opening moves are referred to as ''openings'' and are catalogued in reference works, such as the ''[[Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings]]''. There are thousands of openings, though only a small fraction of them are commonly played; variations of openings may also be given names. Openings vary widely in character from quiet {{chessgloss|positional play}} (for example, the [[RΓ©ti Opening]]) to {{chessgloss|sharp}} aggressive play (like the [[Latvian Gambit]]). In some opening lines, the exact sequence considered best for both sides has been worked out to more than 30 moves.<ref>{{harvp|Tamburro|2010|p=18}}</ref> The fundamental strategic aims of most openings are similar:<ref>{{harvp|Tarrasch|1987}}</ref> * ''Development:'' moving pieces (particularly bishops and knights) forward to squares on which they are useful (defending, attacking, and controlling important squares) and/or have the potential to take part in future plans and ideas. * ''Control of the {{chessgloss|center}}:'' control of the central squares allows pieces to be moved to any part of the board relatively easily, and can inhibit the mobility of the opponent's pieces. * ''King safety:'' typically secured by castling; incorrectly timed castling can be wasteful or even harmful, however. * ''[[Pawn structure]]:'' players strive to avoid the creation of pawn weaknesses such as isolated, doubled, or backward pawns β and to force such weaknesses in the opponent's position. Most players and [[Chess theory|theoreticians]] consider that White, by virtue of the [[Initiative (chess)|initiative]] granted from moving first, [[First-move advantage in chess|begins the game with a small advantage]].<ref>{{harvp|Evans|1958|p=175}}</ref> Black usually strives to neutralize White's advantage and achieve {{chessgloss|equality}}, or to develop {{chessgloss|dynamic}} {{chessgloss|counterplay}} in an unbalanced position. ====Middlegame==== {{Main|Chess middlegame}} The middlegame is the part of the game that starts after the opening. Because the opening theory has ended, players have to form plans based on the features of the position, and at the same time take into account the tactical possibilities of the position.<ref>{{harvp|Harding|2003|pp=32β151}}</ref> The middlegame is the phase in which most [[Combination (chess)|combinations]] occur. Combinations are a series of tactical moves executed to achieve some gain. Middlegame combinations are often connected with an attack against the opponent's king. Some typical patterns have their own names; for example, the [[Boden's Mate]] or the [[Lasker - Bauer, Amsterdam, 1889|LaskerβBauer]] combination.<ref>{{harvp|Hooper|Whyld|1992|p=86}}</ref> Specific plans or strategic themes will often arise from particular groups of openings that result in a specific type of pawn structure. An example is the {{chessgloss|minority attack}}, which is the attack of queenside pawns against an opponent who has more pawns on the queenside. The study of openings is therefore connected to the preparation of plans that are typical of the resulting middlegames.<ref>{{harvp|Silman|1998|pp=202β205}}</ref> Another important strategic question in the middlegame is whether and how to reduce material and transition into an endgame (i.e. {{chessgloss|simplify}}). Minor material advantages can generally be transformed into victory only in an endgame, and therefore the stronger side must choose an appropriate way to achieve an ending. Not every reduction of material is good for this purpose; for example, if one side keeps a light-squared bishop and the opponent has a dark-squared one, the transformation into a [[Chess endgame#Bishop and pawn endings|bishops and pawns]] ending is usually advantageous for the weaker side only, because an endgame with [[opposite-colored bishops endgame|bishops on opposite colors]] is likely to be a draw, even with an advantage of a pawn, or sometimes even with a two-pawn advantage.<ref>{{harvp|Emms|2004|p=90}}</ref> ====Endgame==== {{Main|Chess endgame}} {{Chess diagram |tright |Example of zugzwang | | |kd| | | | | | | |pl| | | | | | | | |kl| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |The side to move is disadvantaged. }} The endgame (also ''end game'' or ''ending'') is the stage of the game when there are few pieces left on the board. There are three main strategic differences between earlier stages of the game and the endgame:<ref>{{harvp|Harding|2003|pp=187ff}}</ref> * Pawns become more important. Endgames often revolve around endeavors to [[Promotion (chess)|promote]] a pawn by advancing it to the furthest {{chessgloss|rank}}. * The king, which requires safeguarding from attack during the middlegame, emerges as a strong piece in the endgame. It is often used to protect its own pawns, attack enemy pawns, and hinder moves of the opponent's king. * [[Zugzwang]], a situation in which the player who is to move is forced to incur a disadvantage, is often a factor in endgames but rarely in other stages of the game. In the example diagram, either side having the move is in zugzwang: Black to move must play 1...Kb7 allowing White to promote the pawn after 2.Kd7; White to move must permit a draw, either by 1.Kc6 [[stalemate]] or by losing the pawn after any other legal move. Endgames can be classified according to the type of pieces remaining on the board. [[Checkmate#Basic checkmates|Basic checkmates]] are positions in which one side has only a king and the other side has one or two pieces and can checkmate the opposing king, with the pieces working together with their king. For example, [[king and pawn endgame]]s involve only kings and pawns on one or both sides, and the task of the stronger side is to promote one of the pawns. Other more complicated endings are classified according to pieces on the board other than kings, such as "[[rook and pawn versus rook]]" endgames. {{clear}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Chess
(section)
Add topic