Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Cauchy–Riemann equations
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Goursat's theorem and its generalizations === {{See also|Cauchy–Goursat theorem}} Suppose that {{math|1=''f'' = ''u'' + i''v''}} is a complex-valued function which is [[Fréchet derivative|differentiable]] as a function <math>f : \mathbb{R}^2 \rarr \mathbb{R}^2</math>. Then [[Édouard Goursat|Goursat]]'s theorem asserts that ''f'' is analytic in an open complex domain Ω if and only if it satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equation in the domain.{{sfn|Rudin|1966|loc=Theorem 11.2}} In particular, continuous differentiability of ''f'' need not be assumed.{{r|Dieudonné1969_para910Ex1}} The hypotheses of Goursat's theorem can be weakened significantly. If {{math|1=''f'' = ''u'' + i''v''}} is continuous in an open set Ω and the [[partial derivative]]s of ''f'' with respect to ''x'' and ''y'' exist in Ω, and satisfy the Cauchy–Riemann equations throughout Ω, then ''f'' is holomorphic (and thus analytic). This result is the [[Looman–Menchoff theorem]]. The hypothesis that ''f'' obey the Cauchy–Riemann equations throughout the domain Ω is essential. It is possible to construct a continuous function satisfying the Cauchy–Riemann equations at a point, but which is not analytic at the point (e.g., {{math|1=''f''(''z'') = ''z''<sup>5</sup>/{{!}}z{{!}}<sup>4</sup>)}}. Similarly, some additional assumption is needed besides the Cauchy–Riemann equations (such as continuity), as the following example illustrates{{sfn|Looman|1923|p=107}} <math display="block">f(z) = \begin{cases} \exp\left(-z^{-4}\right) & \text{if }z \not= 0\\ 0 & \text{if }z = 0 \end{cases}</math> which satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equations everywhere, but fails to be continuous at ''z'' = 0. Nevertheless, if a function satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equations in an open set in a [[weak derivative|weak sense]], then the function is analytic. More precisely:{{sfn|Gray|Morris|1978|loc=Theorem 9}} : If {{math|''f''(''z'')}} is locally integrable in an open domain <math>\Omega \isin \mathbb{C},</math> and satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equations weakly, then {{mvar|f}} agrees [[almost everywhere]] with an analytic function in {{math|Ω}}. This is in fact a special case of a more general result on the regularity of solutions of [[hypoelliptic operator|hypoelliptic]] partial differential equations.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Cauchy–Riemann equations
(section)
Add topic