Editing Brachistochrone curve (section)

=== Introduction ===

In June 1696, Johann Bernoulli had used the pages of the ''Acta Eruditorum Lipsidae'' to pose a challenge to the international mathematical community: to find the form of the curve joining two fixed points so that a mass will slide down along it, under the influence of gravity alone, in the minimum amount of time. The solution was originally to be submitted within six months. At the suggestion of Leibniz, Bernoulli extended the challenge until Easter 1697, by means of a printed text called "Programma", published in [[Groningen]], in the Netherlands.

The ''Programma'' is dated 1 January 1697, in the Gregorian Calendar. This was 22 December 1696 in the Julian Calendar, in use in Britain.
According to Newton's niece, Catherine Conduitt, Newton learned of the challenge at 4 pm on 29 January and had solved it by 4 am the following morning.  His solution, communicated to the Royal Society, is dated 30 January.  This solution, later published anonymously in the ''Philosophical Transactions'', is correct but does not indicate the method by which Newton arrived at his conclusion.  Bernoulli, writing to Henri Basnage in March 1697, indicated that even though its author, "by an excess of modesty", had not revealed his name, yet even from the scant details supplied it could be recognised as Newton's work, "as the lion by its claw" (in Latin, ''ex ungue Leonem'').

D. T. Whiteside notes that the letter in French has ''ex ungue Leonem'' preceded by the French word ''comme''. The much quoted version ''tanquam ex ungue Leonem'' is due to David Brewster's 1855 book on the life and works of Newton. Bernoulli's intention was, Whiteside argues, simply to indicate he could tell the anonymous solution was Newton's, just as it was possible to tell that an animal was a lion given its claw; it was not meant to suggest that Bernoulli considered Newton to be the lion among mathematicians, as it has since come to be interpreted.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Whiteside |first1=Derek Thomas |title=The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton Vol. 8 |date=2008 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-20103-2 |pages=9–10, notes (21) and (22) |edition=Paperback}}</ref>

[[John Wallis]], who was 80 years old at the time, had learned of the problem in September 1696 from Johann Bernoulli's youngest brother Hieronymus, and had spent three months attempting a solution before passing it in December to [[David Gregory (mathematician)|David Gregory]], who also failed to solve it. After Newton had submitted his solution, Gregory asked him for the details and made notes from their conversation. These can be found in the University of Edinburgh Library, manuscript A <math>78^1</math>, dated 7 March 1697.  Either Gregory did not understand Newton's argument, or Newton's explanation was very brief. However, it is possible, with a high degree of confidence, to construct Newton's proof from Gregory's notes, by analogy with his method to determine the solid of minimum resistance (Principia, Book 2, Proposition 34, Scholium 2). A detailed description of his solution of this latter problem is included in the draft of a letter in 1694, also to David Gregory.<ref name="Dubois">{{cite journal |last=Dubois |first=Jacques |date=1991 |title=Chute d'une bille le long d'une gouttière cycloïdale; Tautochrone et brachistochrone; Propriétés et historique |url=http://sciences-physiques-moodle.ac-orleans-tours.fr/moodle/pluginfile.php/2162/mod_resource/content/0/gouin/cab_gouin12novembre2006/cycloid_fichiers/cyclo_rectif.pdf |journal=Bulletin de l'Union des Physiciens |volume=85 |issue=737 |pages=1251–1289 }}</ref>  In addition to the minimum time curve problem, there was a second problem that Newton also solved at the same time. Both solutions appeared anonymously in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, for January 1697.