Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Analytic philosophy
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Logical positivism === {{multiple image | align = right | perrow = 2 | total_width = | image1 = Schlick sitting.jpg | width1 = 150 | caption1 = (1) | image2 = Otto Neurath.jpg | width2 = 150 | caption2 = (2) | image3 = Hans Hahn.jpg | width3 = 150 | caption3 = (3) | image4=Rudolf Carnap 1922.jpeg | width4=150 |caption4= (4) | footer =Members of the Vienna Circle (clockwise):<br />(1) Moritz Schlick<br />(2) Otto Neurath;<br />(3) Hans Hahn<br />(4) Rudolf Carnap }} {{Main|Logical positivism}} During the late 1920s to 1940s, a group of philosophers known as the [[Vienna Circle]], and another one known as the [[Berlin Circle]], developed Russell and Wittgenstein's philosophy into a doctrine known as "[[logical positivism]]" (or logical empiricism). The Vienna Circle was led by [[Moritz Schlick]] and included [[Rudolf Carnap]] and [[Otto Neurath]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://indystar.newspapers.com/article/the-baltimore-sun-logical-positivism-pag/134256383/ |title=Savants Move to Abandon Metaphysical Philosophy |date=December 31, 1935 |work=Baltimore Sun}}</ref> The Berlin Circle was led by [[Hans Reichenbach]] and included [[Carl Hempel]] and mathematician [[David Hilbert]]. Logical positivists used formal logical methods to develop an empiricist account of knowledge.<ref>{{cite book |last=Carnap |first=R. |title=The Logical Structure of the World |publisher=Felix Meiner Verlag |year=1928 |isbn=978-0-8126-9523-6 |lccn=66013604}}</ref> They adopted the [[verification principle]], according to which every meaningful statement is either [[Analytic proposition|analytic]] or synthetic. The truths of logic and mathematics were [[tautology (logic)|tautologies]], and those of science were verifiable empirical claims. These two constituted the entire universe of meaningful judgments; anything else was nonsense. This led the logical positivists to reject many traditional problems of philosophy, especially those of [[metaphysics]], as meaningless. It had the additional effect of making (ethical and aesthetic) value judgments (as well as religious statements and beliefs) meaningless. Logical positivists therefore typically considered philosophy as having a [[Quietism (philosophy)|minimal function]]. For them, philosophy concerned the clarification of thoughts, rather than having a distinct subject matter of its own. Several logical positivists were Jewish, such as Neurath, [[Hans Hahn (mathematician)|Hans Hahn]], [[Philipp Frank]], [[Friedrich Waismann|Friedrich Waissmann]], and Reichenbach. Others, like Carnap, were gentiles but socialists or pacifists. With the coming to power of [[Adolf Hitler]] and [[Nazism]] in 1933, many members of the Vienna and Berlin Circles fled to Britain and the United States, which helped to reinforce the dominance of logical positivism and analytic philosophy in anglophone countries. In 1936, Schlick was murdered in Vienna by his former student [[Hans Nelböck]]. The same year, [[A. J. Ayer]]'s work ''[[Language Truth and Logic]]'' introduced the English speaking world to logical positivism.{{efn| Named in reference to Waismann's ''Logik, Sprache, Philosophie''}} The logical positivists saw their rejection of metaphysics in some ways as a recapitulation of a quote by [[David Hume]]: <blockquote>If we take in our hand any volume; of divinity or school metaphysics, for instance; let us ask, Does it contain any abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number? No. Does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence? No. Commit it then to the flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion.<ref>An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748) sect. 12, pt. 3</ref></blockquote>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Analytic philosophy
(section)
Add topic