Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Tigran Petrosian
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== The positional exchange sacrifice === Petrosian was known for his use of the "[[The exchange (chess)#The exchange sacrifice|positional exchange sacrifice]]", where one side sacrifices a rook for the opponent's bishop or knight. Kasparov discussed Petrosian's use of this motif: {{quote|Petrosian introduced the exchange sacrifice for the sake of 'quality of position', where [[Initiative (chess)|the time factor]], which is so important in the play of Alekhine and Tal, plays hardly any role. Even today, very few players can operate confidently at the board with such abstract concepts. Before Petrosian no one had studied this. By sacrificing the exchange 'just like that', for certain long term advantages, in positions with disrupted material balance, he discovered latent resources that few were capable of seeing and properly evaluating.{{sfn|Kasparov|2004|p=12}}}} {{Chess diagram small | tright | Reshevsky vs. Petrosian, 1953 | | | |rd|qd| |kd| | | | | |rd|pd|pd|pd | | |nd| | | |bd| | pd|pd| | |pl| | | | | |pd|pl| |ql|bl| | pl| |pl| |rl| | | | |bl| | | | |pl|pl | | | | |rl| |kl| | Position after 25.Rfe1 |reverse=true }} One of Petrosian's most famous examples of the positional exchange sacrifice is from his game against [[Samuel Reshevsky]] in Zurich 1953<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1106248|title=Samuel Reshevsky vs Tigran V Petrosian (1953)|website=chessgames.com}}</ref> ({{em|diagram}}). Reshevsky, as White, appears to have an advantage due to his strong {{chessgloss|pawn centre}}, which may become mobile after Bf3 and d4βd5. Petrosian realized he was in a difficult position because of the passive placement of his pieces, relegated to defensive roles. He further understood that White might also advance on the {{chessgloss|kingside}} with h2βh4βh5, provoking weaknesses that would make it more difficult to defend later on. Faced with these threats, Petrosian devised a plan to maneuver his knight to the square d5, where it would be prominently placed in the centre and blockade the advance of White's pawns. :'''25... Re6{{chesspunc|!}}''' With the rook vacated from e7, the black knight is free to move to d5, where it will be attacking the pawn on c3 and help support an eventual advance of his {{chessgloss|queenside}} pawn {{chessgloss|majority}} with ...b5βb4. :'''26. a4 Ne7 27. Bxe6 fxe6 28. Qf1 Nd5 29. Rf3 Bd3 30. Rxd3 cxd3''' The game was eventually drawn on move 41.{{sfn|Petrosian|1990|pp=68β69}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Tigran Petrosian
(section)
Add topic