Editing Thomas Young (scientist) (section)

===Egyptian hieroglyphs===
{{main|Decipherment of ancient Egyptian scripts}}
Young made significant contributions to the [[decipher]]ment of [[writing in ancient Egypt|ancient Egyptian writing systems]]. He started his Egyptology work rather late, in 1813, when the work was already in progress among other researchers. He began by using an [[Demotic (Egyptian)|Egyptian demotic]] alphabet of 29 letters built up by [[Johan David Åkerblad]] in 1802 (14 turned out to be incorrect). Åkerblad was correct in stressing the importance of the demotic text in trying to read the inscriptions, but he wrongly believed that demotic was entirely alphabetic.<ref>E.A.W. Budge, [1893], [http://www.sacred-texts.com/egy/trs/trs04.htm ''The Rosetta Stone.''] www.sacred-texts.com p132</ref>

By 1814 Young had completely translated the "enchorial" text of the [[Rosetta Stone]]<ref name="EB1911" /> (using a list with 86 demotic words), and then studied the [[Egyptian hieroglyph|hieroglyphic alphabet]] but initially failed to recognise that the demotic and hieroglyphic texts were paraphrases and not simple translations.<ref>Young's first publications are as follows: "Letter to the Rev. S. Weston respecting some Egyptian Antiquities". With four copper plates [published under the name of his friend William Rouse Boughton, but written by Young], ''Archeologia Britannica''. London, 1814. Vol. XVIII. P. 59-72; [Anonymous publication], Museum Criticum of Cambridge, Pt. VI., 1815 (this includes the correspondence which took place between Young, [[Silvestre de Sacy]] and Akerblad)</ref>

There was considerable rivalry between Young and [[Jean-François Champollion]] while both were working on hieroglyphic decipherment. At first they briefly cooperated in their work, but later, from around 1815, a chill arose between them. For many years they kept details of their work away from each other. When Champollion finally published a translation of the hieroglyphs and the key to the grammatical system in 1822, Young (and many others) praised his work. Nevertheless, a year later Young published an ''Account of the Recent Discoveries in Hieroglyphic Literature and Egyptian Antiquities'',<ref name="EB1911" /> with the aim of having his own work recognised as the basis for Champollion's system.

Some of Young's conclusions appeared in the famous article "Egypt" he wrote for the 1818 edition of the ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]''.<ref name="EB1911" />

Young had correctly found the sound value of six hieroglyphic signs, but had not deduced the grammar of the language. Young himself acknowledged that he was somewhat at a disadvantage because Champollion's knowledge of the relevant languages, such as Coptic, was much greater.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Singh|first1=Simon|title=The Decipherment of Hieroglyphs|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/egyptians/decipherment_01.shtml|publisher=BBC|access-date=8 October 2015}}</ref>

Several scholars have suggested that Young's true contribution to Egyptology was his decipherment of the demotic script. He made the first major advances in this area; he also correctly identified demotic as being composed by both ideographic and phonetic signs.{{sfn|Adkins|Adkins|2000|p=277}}

Subsequently, Young felt that Champollion was unwilling to share the credit for the decipherment. In the ensuing controversy, strongly motivated by the political tensions of that time, the British tended to champion Young, while the French mostly championed Champollion. Champollion did acknowledge some of Young's contribution, but rather sparingly. However, after 1826, when Champollion was a curator in the [[Louvre]], he did offer Young access to demotic manuscripts.<ref>{{cite web|title=Jean-François Champollion|url=http://greathistorians.com/en/jean-francois-champollion|publisher=Great Historians|access-date=8 October 2015|archive-date=20 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200420184428/https://www.greathistorians.com/en/jean-francois-champollion|url-status=dead}}</ref>

In England, while [[Sir George Cornewall Lewis, 2nd Baronet|Sir George Lewis]] still doubted Champollion's achievement as late as 1862, others were more accepting. For example, [[Reginald Stuart Poole|Reginald Poole]], and Sir [[Peter Le Page Renouf]] both defended Champollion.{{sfn|Thomasson|2013}}