Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Slavery
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Economics === Economists have modeled the circumstances under which slavery (and variants such as [[serfdom]]) appear and disappear. One theoretical model is that slavery becomes more desirable for [[Land tenure|landowners]] where land is abundant, but labour is scarce, such that rent is depressed and paid workers can demand high wages. If the opposite holds true, then it is more costly for landowners to guard the slaves than to employ paid workers who can demand only low wages because of the degree of competition.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=North |first1=Douglass C. |first2=Robert Paul |last2=Thomas |title=The Rise and Fall of the Manorial System: A Theoretical Model |journal=[[The Journal of Economic History]] |date=December 1971 |volume=31 |issue=4 |pages=777β803 |jstor=2117209 |doi=10.1017/S0022050700074623 |s2cid=154616683}}</ref> Thus, first slavery and then serfdom gradually decreased in Europe as the population grew. They were reintroduced in the Americas and in Russia as large areas of land with few inhabitants became available.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Domar |first=Evsey D. |title=The Causes of Slavery or Serfdom: A Hypothesis |journal=[[The Journal of Economic History]] |date=March 1970 |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=18β32 |jstor=2116721 |doi=10.1017/S0022050700078566 |s2cid=154921369}}</ref> Slavery is more common when the tasks are relatively simple and thus easy to supervise, such as large-scale [[Monocropping|monocrops]] such as [[sugarcane]] and [[cotton]], in which output depended on [[economies of scale]]. This enables systems of labour, such as the [[gang system]] in the United States, to become prominent on large plantations where field hands toiled with factory-like precision. Then, each work gang was based on an internal division of labour that assigned every member of the gang to a task and made each worker's performance dependent on the actions of the others. The slaves chopped out the weeds that surrounded the cotton plants as well as excess sprouts. Plow gangs followed behind, stirring the soil near the plants and tossing it back around the plants. Thus, the gang system worked like an [[assembly line]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=LagerlΓΆf |first1=Nils-Petter |url=https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/372.html |title=Slavery and other property rights |journal=MPRA Paper 372 |date=November 12, 2006 |access-date=May 6, 2009 }}</ref> Since the 18th century, critics have argued that slavery hinders technological advancement because the focus is on increasing the number of slaves doing simple tasks rather than upgrading their efficiency. For example, it is sometimes argued that, because of this narrow focus, technology in Greece β and later in Rome β was not applied to ease physical labour or improve manufacturing.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.history.com/encyclopedia.do?articleId=223811 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080423152702/http://www.history.com/encyclopedia.do?articleId=223811 |archive-date=April 23, 2008 |title=Technology |publisher=History.com |date=January 4, 2008 |access-date=May 6, 2009}}</ref><ref name=Helper>{{cite book|last=Helper|first=Hinton Rowan|authorlink=Hinton Rowan Helper|date=1857|location=New York|publisher=Burdick Brothers|title=The Impending Crisis of the South: How to Meet It|url=https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/36055}}</ref> [[File:Fathers of the Redemption.jpg|thumb|The work of the [[Mercedarians]] was in ransoming Christian slaves held in North Africa (1637).]] Scottish economist [[Adam Smith]] stated that free labour was economically better than slave labour, and that it was nearly impossible to end slavery in a free, democratic, or republican form of government since many of its legislators or political figures were slave owners and would not punish themselves. He further stated that slaves would be better able to gain their freedom under centralized government, or a central authority like a king or church.<ref>{{cite book |first1=John R. |last1=McKivigan |first2=Mitchell |last2=Snay |title=Religion and the Antebellum Debate Over Slavery |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=e-unV4v5puYC|page=68}} |access-date=May 31, 2012 |year=1998 |publisher=[[University of Georgia Press]] |isbn=978-0-8203-2076-2 |page=68}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Charles L. |last=Griswold |title=Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment |url={{google books|plainurl=y|id=WRcU_GJAc9gC|page=198}} |access-date=May 31, 2012 |year=1999 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-0-521-62891-4 |page=198}}</ref> Similar arguments appeared later in the works of [[Auguste Comte]], especially given Smith's belief in the [[separation of powers]], or what Comte called the "separation of the spiritual and the temporal" during the [[Middle Ages]] and the end of slavery, and Smith's criticism of masters, past and present. As Smith stated in the ''[[Lectures on Jurisprudence]]'', "The great power of the clergy thus concurring with that of the king set the slaves at liberty. But it was absolutely necessary both that the authority of the king and of the clergy should be great. Where ever any one of these was wanting, slavery still continues..."{{sfn|Forbes|1998|p=74}} [[File:The inspection and sale of a slave.jpg|thumb|Sale and inspection of slaves]] Even after slavery became a criminal offense, slave owners could get high returns. According to researcher [[Siddharth Kara]], the profits generated worldwide by all forms of slavery in 2007 were $91.2 billion. That was second only to drug trafficking, in terms of global criminal enterprises. At the time the weighted average global sales price of a slave was estimated to be approximately $340, with a high of $1,895 for the average trafficked sex slave, and a low of $40 to $50 for debt bondage slaves in part of Asia and Africa. The weighted average annual profits generated by a slave in 2007 was $3,175, with a low of an average $950 for bonded labour and $29,210 for a trafficked sex slave. Approximately 40% of slave profits each year were generated by trafficked sex slaves, representing slightly more than 4% of the world's 29 million slaves.<ref name="Dhaliwal">{{Cite book |last=Kara |first=Siddharth |title=Sex Trafficking β Inside the Business of Modern Slavery |date=2008 |publisher=[[Columbia University Press]] |isbn=978-0-231-13960-1}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Slavery
(section)
Add topic