Editing Pisco (section)

==Appellation of origin==
The right to use an [[appellation of origin]] for pisco is hotly contested between Peru and Chile, though historians generally believe that pisco originated from Peru.<ref name=":1">{{cite news |title=Tale of a 'tail: The pisco sour |url=https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/pisco-sour-chile-peru/index.html |publisher=[[CNN]] |date=2018-10-02 |access-date=2018-10-04}}</ref>

Peru claims the exclusive right to use the term "pisco" only for products from Peru,{{Citation needed|date=June 2017}}  but they have not generally been able to persuade other countries to adopt that interpretation. Chile, in contrast, regards the term "pisco" as generic, and it argues the spirit is simply a ''type'' of alcoholic beverage made from grapes (as in the case of whisky and vodka). It cites the name being used to designate a similar grape brandy produced in both countries and maintains two [[Chile#Administrative divisions|regions]] of Chile, [[Atacama Region|Atacama]] and [[Coquimbo Region|Coquimbo]], that it authorizes to use the term.<ref name="dfl181">{{Cite web|url=http://www.feriadoschilenos.cl/normas.html#DFL_181_1931_MINAGR|title=Días feriados en Chile: Anexos - Listado de leyes y otras normas relevantes|access-date=20 December 2012|author=Farah, Miguel|date=19 October 2008|publisher=www.feriadoschilenos.cl}}</ref>

Large-market countries (e.g., the European Union,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:289:0048:0048:EN:PDF|title=Commission Regulation No 1065/2013, European Commission, 30 October 2013}}</ref><ref name="EUMainSpecs">[http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2011:141:0016:0018:EN:PDF Main Specifications of the Technical File for 'Pisco'], European Commission document 2011/C 141/16, 12 May 2011.</ref> the United States,<ref name="SICE">{{cite web|url=http://www.sice.oas.org/Trade/chiusa_e/Text_e.asp |title=SICE – Free Trade Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Chile |publisher=SICE |access-date=2012-03-26}}</ref> France,<ref name="WIPO865">{{cite web|url=http://www.wipo.int/cgi-lis/guest/ifetch5?ENG+LISBON+17-00+41336012-KEY+256+0+865+F-ENG+1+2+1+25+SEP-0/HITNUM,NO,APP-ENG+Pisco+|title=Appelation 865: Pisco, WIPO}}</ref><ref name="France">[http://www.wipo.int/ipdl/IPDL-IMAGES/LISBON-IMAGES/0865_fr.pdf France refusal of protection of Pisco appellation (appellation registration no. 865)] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304051216/http://www.wipo.int/ipdl/IPDL-IMAGES/LISBON-IMAGES/0865_fr.pdf |date=2016-03-04}}, submitted to [[WIPO]] by [[France]], 7 July 2006 (in French)</ref> Italy,<ref name="WIPO865" /><ref name="Italy">[http://www.wipo.int/ipdl/IPDL-IMAGES/LISBON-IMAGES/0865_it.pdf Italy refusal of protection of Pisco appellation (appellation registration no. 865)] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160509092208/http://www.wipo.int/ipdl/IPDL-IMAGES/LISBON-IMAGES/0865_it.pdf |date=2016-05-09}}, submitted to [[WIPO]] by [[Italy]], 7 July 2006 (in French)</ref> Mexico,<ref name="WIPO865" /><ref>[http://www.wipo.int/ipdl/IPDL-IMAGES/LISBON-IMAGES/0865_mx.pdf Mexico negation of protection of Pisco appellation (appellation registration no. 865)] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304052924/http://www.wipo.int/ipdl/IPDL-IMAGES/LISBON-IMAGES/0865_mx.pdf |date=2016-03-04}}, submitted to [[WIPO]] by [[Mexico]] 19 June and 24 October 2006 (in Spanish and French)</ref> Canada,<ref name="Canada1">Roffe, P., [http://www.qiap.ca/pages/documents/Chile_US_final.pdf Bilateral Agreements and a TRIPS-plus World: The Chile–USA Free Trade Agreement], Quaker International Affaires Programme, Ottawa.</ref><ref name="Canada2">[http://www.gazette.gc.ca/archives/p1/2002/2002-08-10/pdf/g1-13632.pdf Canada Gazette Part I, Vol. 136, No. 32] (pages 2422 and 2423), August 10, 2002.</ref> Australia,<ref name="Australia">{{cite web |url=http://www.dfat.gov.au/fta/aclfta/Australia-Chile-FTA-01.html |title=Australia-Chile Free Trade Agreement, Article 3.12: Treatment of Certain Spirits |publisher=Dfat.gov.au |date=2011-01-13 |access-date=2012-03-26 |archive-date=2012-03-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120324081326/http://dfat.gov.au/fta/aclfta/Australia-Chile-FTA-01.html |url-status=dead}}</ref> etc.) generally allow products of both Peru and Chile to be identified as "pisco". The [[European Commission]] considers that pisco originates from Peru, but also allows the term to be used for products from Chile.<ref name="EC110/2008"> Annex III of [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02008R0110-20180823 EC Regulation 110/2008, amended]. Retrieved 2019-03-24</ref>