Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Mathematical proof
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Probabilistic proof=== {{Main|Probabilistic method}} A probabilistic proof is one in which an example is shown to exist, with certainty, by using methods of [[probability theory]]. Probabilistic proof, like proof by construction, is one of many ways to prove [[existence theorem]]s. In the probabilistic method, one seeks an object having a given property, starting with a large set of candidates. One assigns a certain probability for each candidate to be chosen, and then proves that there is a non-zero probability that a chosen candidate will have the desired property. This does not specify which candidates have the property, but the probability could not be positive without at least one. A probabilistic proof is not to be confused with an argument that a theorem is 'probably' true, a 'plausibility argument'. The work toward the [[Collatz conjecture]] shows how far plausibility is from genuine proof, as does the disproof of the [[Mertens conjecture]]. While most mathematicians do not think that probabilistic evidence for the properties of a given object counts as a genuine mathematical proof, a few mathematicians and philosophers have argued that at least some types of probabilistic evidence (such as Rabin's [[probabilistic algorithm]] for [[primality test|testing primality]]) are as good as genuine mathematical proofs.<ref>Davis, Philip J. (1972), "Fidelity in Mathematical Discourse: Is One and One Really Two?" ''American Mathematical Monthly'' 79:252β63.</ref><ref>Fallis, Don (1997), "The Epistemic Status of Probabilistic Proof." ''Journal of Philosophy'' 94:165β86.</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Mathematical proof
(section)
Add topic